File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training on arterial stiffness

TitleEffect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training on arterial stiffness
Authors
KeywordsAerobic exercise training
Combined exercise training
Arterial stiffness
Issue Date2015
Citation
International Journal of Cardiology, 2015, v. 178, p. 69-76 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Background While aerobic exercise training may decrease arterial stiffness, the impact of combined aerobic and resistance training is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review and quantify the effect of combined aerobic and resistance training on arterial stiffness, as determined by arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV), and compare it with aerobic training.Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched through November 2013 for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of aerobic or combined aerobic and resistance training on PWV. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) in PWV between exercise and control groups. Subgroup analyses were used to study potential moderating factors.Results Twenty-one randomized controlled trials comparing exercise and control groups (overall n = 752), met the inclusion criteria. After data pooling, PWV was decreased in aerobic trained groups compared with controls (10 trials, SMD = - 0.52, 95% CI = - 0.76, - 0.27; P < 0.0001) but did not reach statistical significance in combined trained groups compared with controls (11 trials, SMD = - 0.23, 95% CI = - 0.50, 0.04; P = 0.10). The effect in aerobic trained groups did not differ compared with combined trained groups (P = 0.12). In addition, aerobic training resulted in significantly lower SMD in PWV compared with combined training in interventions including a higher volume of aerobic training or assessing carotid-femoral PWV.Conclusions These data suggest that combined aerobic and resistance training interventions may have reduced beneficial effects on arterial stiffness compared with control interventions, but do not appear to differ significantly with aerobic training alone.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288642
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.126
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMontero, David-
dc.contributor.authorVinet, Agnès-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Christian K.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T08:05:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-12T08:05:29Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2015, v. 178, p. 69-76-
dc.identifier.issn0167-5273-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288642-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Background While aerobic exercise training may decrease arterial stiffness, the impact of combined aerobic and resistance training is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review and quantify the effect of combined aerobic and resistance training on arterial stiffness, as determined by arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV), and compare it with aerobic training.Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched through November 2013 for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of aerobic or combined aerobic and resistance training on PWV. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) in PWV between exercise and control groups. Subgroup analyses were used to study potential moderating factors.Results Twenty-one randomized controlled trials comparing exercise and control groups (overall n = 752), met the inclusion criteria. After data pooling, PWV was decreased in aerobic trained groups compared with controls (10 trials, SMD = - 0.52, 95% CI = - 0.76, - 0.27; P < 0.0001) but did not reach statistical significance in combined trained groups compared with controls (11 trials, SMD = - 0.23, 95% CI = - 0.50, 0.04; P = 0.10). The effect in aerobic trained groups did not differ compared with combined trained groups (P = 0.12). In addition, aerobic training resulted in significantly lower SMD in PWV compared with combined training in interventions including a higher volume of aerobic training or assessing carotid-femoral PWV.Conclusions These data suggest that combined aerobic and resistance training interventions may have reduced beneficial effects on arterial stiffness compared with control interventions, but do not appear to differ significantly with aerobic training alone.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Cardiology-
dc.subjectAerobic exercise training-
dc.subjectCombined exercise training-
dc.subjectArterial stiffness-
dc.titleEffect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training on arterial stiffness-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.147-
dc.identifier.pmid25464222-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84916212866-
dc.identifier.volume178-
dc.identifier.spage69-
dc.identifier.epage76-
dc.identifier.eissn1874-1754-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000345697300021-
dc.identifier.issnl0167-5273-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats