File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85050152411
- PMID: 30033037
- WOS: WOS:000444365900007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating
Title | Risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Risk of bias Eating disorder Randomized clinical trial Psychological intervention Confirmatory factor analysis |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Annals of Epidemiology, 2018, v. 28, n. 9, p. 625-628.e1 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Purpose: In the context of Cochrane systematic reviews/meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, risk of bias (RoB) is assessed using categorical indicators (low, unclear, or high RoB). This study sought to evaluate the indicators of the Cochrane RoB tool available for construct validity as applied to randomized clinical trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating. Methods: Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity of the measurement model underlying the set of five categorical items, and the reliability of these indicators to measure RoB. Results: In 48 primary randomized clinical trials, the model showed good fit indices and factor loadings higher than 0.4. Conclusions: The results support the construct validity of the Cochrane RoB tool and the reliability of three of five items in this health intervention context. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/288580 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.382 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Trevizo, Juliana Pagotto | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hay, Phillipa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Swardfager, Walter | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cogo-Moreira, Hugo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-12T08:05:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-12T08:05:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Annals of Epidemiology, 2018, v. 28, n. 9, p. 625-628.e1 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1047-2797 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/288580 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Purpose: In the context of Cochrane systematic reviews/meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, risk of bias (RoB) is assessed using categorical indicators (low, unclear, or high RoB). This study sought to evaluate the indicators of the Cochrane RoB tool available for construct validity as applied to randomized clinical trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating. Methods: Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity of the measurement model underlying the set of five categorical items, and the reliability of these indicators to measure RoB. Results: In 48 primary randomized clinical trials, the model showed good fit indices and factor loadings higher than 0.4. Conclusions: The results support the construct validity of the Cochrane RoB tool and the reliability of three of five items in this health intervention context. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Epidemiology | - |
dc.subject | Risk of bias | - |
dc.subject | Eating disorder | - |
dc.subject | Randomized clinical trial | - |
dc.subject | Psychological intervention | - |
dc.subject | Confirmatory factor analysis | - |
dc.title | Risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binge eating | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.006 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30033037 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85050152411 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 625 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 628.e1 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-2585 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000444365900007 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1047-2797 | - |