File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105724
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85087517829
- WOS: WOS:000560722900012
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: New light-weight concrete foam to absorb debris-flow-entrained boulder impact: Large-scale pendulum modelling
Title | New light-weight concrete foam to absorb debris-flow-entrained boulder impact: Large-scale pendulum modelling |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Boulder Impact Cushioning material Debris flow Concrete foam |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enggeo |
Citation | Engineering Geology, 2020, v. 275, p. article no. 105724 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Rock-filled gabions are widely used to attenuate concentrated impact loads exerted by boulders entrained in debris flows. However, rock fragments used to construct gabion may not always be available and the performance of rock-filled gabion can be highly variable, depending on size and angularity of the rock fragments used. In this study, light-weight concrete foam is proposed as an alternative cushioning material to overcome some of the limitations of rock-filled gabion. Physical large-scale pendulum impact tests were conducted to study the performance of concrete foam, which was used to shield a reinforced concrete barrier from boulder impact. Six successive boulder impacts were carried out at energies of up to 70 kJ. Two different concrete foam thicknesses, 0.4 m and 0.6 m, were investigated. Increasing the cushioning thickness from 0.4 m to 0.6 m can reduce the maximum transmitted load by 48% and 71% for the first and sixth impacts at an impact energy of 70 kJ, respectively. The larger cushioning thickness enhances load spreading on the wall and reduces stress concentration. Furthermore, the maximum penetration depth on the 0.4-m thick concrete foam is 0.29 m for the sixth impact at an impact energy of 70 kJ, which is equivalent to 72% of the initial cushioning layer thickness. Based on the existing design guidelines (ASTRA 2010) and the Gibson and Ashby model, the required minimum thickness for up to six successive impacts at an impact energy of 70 kJ is 0.58 m. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/287934 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 6.902 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.441 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Su, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, CE | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, CWW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, HWK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, LA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, C | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-05T12:05:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-05T12:05:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Engineering Geology, 2020, v. 275, p. article no. 105724 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0013-7952 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/287934 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Rock-filled gabions are widely used to attenuate concentrated impact loads exerted by boulders entrained in debris flows. However, rock fragments used to construct gabion may not always be available and the performance of rock-filled gabion can be highly variable, depending on size and angularity of the rock fragments used. In this study, light-weight concrete foam is proposed as an alternative cushioning material to overcome some of the limitations of rock-filled gabion. Physical large-scale pendulum impact tests were conducted to study the performance of concrete foam, which was used to shield a reinforced concrete barrier from boulder impact. Six successive boulder impacts were carried out at energies of up to 70 kJ. Two different concrete foam thicknesses, 0.4 m and 0.6 m, were investigated. Increasing the cushioning thickness from 0.4 m to 0.6 m can reduce the maximum transmitted load by 48% and 71% for the first and sixth impacts at an impact energy of 70 kJ, respectively. The larger cushioning thickness enhances load spreading on the wall and reduces stress concentration. Furthermore, the maximum penetration depth on the 0.4-m thick concrete foam is 0.29 m for the sixth impact at an impact energy of 70 kJ, which is equivalent to 72% of the initial cushioning layer thickness. Based on the existing design guidelines (ASTRA 2010) and the Gibson and Ashby model, the required minimum thickness for up to six successive impacts at an impact energy of 70 kJ is 0.58 m. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enggeo | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Engineering Geology | - |
dc.subject | Boulder | - |
dc.subject | Impact | - |
dc.subject | Cushioning material | - |
dc.subject | Debris flow | - |
dc.subject | Concrete foam | - |
dc.title | New light-weight concrete foam to absorb debris-flow-entrained boulder impact: Large-scale pendulum modelling | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Choi, CE: cechoi@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Choi, CE=rp02576 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105724 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85087517829 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 315847 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 275 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 105724 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 105724 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000560722900012 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0013-7952 | - |