File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Porous Metal acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: ≥5-Year Follow-up of 24 Patients

TitlePorous Metal acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: ≥5-Year Follow-up of 24 Patients
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.
Citation
The 39th Annual Congress of The Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA), Hong Kong, 2–3 November 2019 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Severe acetabular bone loss has been a major difficulty in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous metal acetabular revision system provides solution for insufficient host-bone contact. Methods: Twenty-four patients who underwent revision THA using Trabecular Metal (Zimmer) acetabular revision system were reviewed after minimum follow-up of 5 years. The most common causes of revision were aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear with osteolysis, and periprosthetic joint infection. Trabecular metal cup alone, trabecular metal cup with augment, and cup-cage construct were used in 12, 8, and 4 hips, respectively. Results: After a mean follow-up of 9 years (standard deviation 2.6, range 6-14 years), 23 (96%) patients had excellent outcomes in functional and radiological assessments. All patients had significant improvement in Harris Hip Score after operation. No acetabular component loosening was found. No re-revision surgery was performed for mechanical failure of acetabular component. One (4%) patient had asymptomatic insert wear without osteolysis. Two (8%) patients had periprosthetic joint infection, which was successfully treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. One (4%) patient had superficial wound infection, which was successfully treated with incision and drainage. Conclusion: A longer period of follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome of the use of porous metal acetabular shell. Our data suggest the use of porous metal acetabular shell to be considered a safe technique with excellent outcome to tackle the difficulty of massive bone loss during revision THA.
DescriptionFree Paper Session II: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. FP2.21
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287900

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKo, TS-
dc.contributor.authorChan, LPK-
dc.contributor.authorYan, CH-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, KY-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:04:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:04:53Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe 39th Annual Congress of The Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA), Hong Kong, 2–3 November 2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287900-
dc.descriptionFree Paper Session II: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. FP2.21-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Severe acetabular bone loss has been a major difficulty in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous metal acetabular revision system provides solution for insufficient host-bone contact. Methods: Twenty-four patients who underwent revision THA using Trabecular Metal (Zimmer) acetabular revision system were reviewed after minimum follow-up of 5 years. The most common causes of revision were aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear with osteolysis, and periprosthetic joint infection. Trabecular metal cup alone, trabecular metal cup with augment, and cup-cage construct were used in 12, 8, and 4 hips, respectively. Results: After a mean follow-up of 9 years (standard deviation 2.6, range 6-14 years), 23 (96%) patients had excellent outcomes in functional and radiological assessments. All patients had significant improvement in Harris Hip Score after operation. No acetabular component loosening was found. No re-revision surgery was performed for mechanical failure of acetabular component. One (4%) patient had asymptomatic insert wear without osteolysis. Two (8%) patients had periprosthetic joint infection, which was successfully treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention. One (4%) patient had superficial wound infection, which was successfully treated with incision and drainage. Conclusion: A longer period of follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome of the use of porous metal acetabular shell. Our data suggest the use of porous metal acetabular shell to be considered a safe technique with excellent outcome to tackle the difficulty of massive bone loss during revision THA.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2019-
dc.titlePorous Metal acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: ≥5-Year Follow-up of 24 Patients-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChan, LPK: cpk464@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYan, CH: yanchoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, PKY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYan, CH=rp00303-
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, PKY=rp00379-
dc.identifier.hkuros315260-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats