File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Posttransplant management of recipients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Working group report from the ILTS Transplant Oncology Consensus Conference

TitlePosttransplant management of recipients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Working group report from the ILTS Transplant Oncology Consensus Conference
Authors
Keywordsablation therapy
adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
consensus
consensus development
diagnosis
Issue Date2020
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.transplantjournal.com
Citation
Transplantation, 2020, v. 104 n. 6, p. 1143-1149 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), recurrence occurs in 6%–18% of patients. Several factors, particularly morphological criteria combined with dynamic parameters, known before LT modify this risk and combined in prediction models may be used to stratify patients at need of variable surveillance strategies. Additional variables though likely explain differences in recurrence rates in patients with the same pre-LT HCC status. One of these variables is possibly immunosuppression (IS). Once recurrence takes place, management is highly heterogenous. Within the International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Conference on Liver Transplant Oncology, working group 4 aim was to analyze the data regarding posttransplant management of recipients undergoing LT for HCC. Three areas of research were considered: (1) cancer prediction models and surveillance strategies; (2) tailored IS for cancer recipients; and (3) new adjuvant therapies for HCC recurrence. Following formulation of several questions, a literature search was undertaken with abstract review followed by article retrieval and full-data extraction. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system was used for evidence rating incorporating strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.
DescriptionLink to Free access
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287731
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 4.264
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.699

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerenguer, M-
dc.contributor.authorBurra, P-
dc.contributor.authorGhobrial, M-
dc.contributor.authorHibi, T-
dc.contributor.authorMetselaar, H-
dc.contributor.authorSapisochin, G-
dc.contributor.authorBhoori, S-
dc.contributor.authorMan, K-
dc.contributor.authorMas, V-
dc.contributor.authorOhira, M-
dc.contributor.authorSangro, B-
dc.contributor.authorvan der Laan, LJW-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:02:26Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:02:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationTransplantation, 2020, v. 104 n. 6, p. 1143-1149-
dc.identifier.issn0041-1337-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287731-
dc.descriptionLink to Free access-
dc.description.abstractAlthough liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), recurrence occurs in 6%–18% of patients. Several factors, particularly morphological criteria combined with dynamic parameters, known before LT modify this risk and combined in prediction models may be used to stratify patients at need of variable surveillance strategies. Additional variables though likely explain differences in recurrence rates in patients with the same pre-LT HCC status. One of these variables is possibly immunosuppression (IS). Once recurrence takes place, management is highly heterogenous. Within the International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Conference on Liver Transplant Oncology, working group 4 aim was to analyze the data regarding posttransplant management of recipients undergoing LT for HCC. Three areas of research were considered: (1) cancer prediction models and surveillance strategies; (2) tailored IS for cancer recipients; and (3) new adjuvant therapies for HCC recurrence. Following formulation of several questions, a literature search was undertaken with abstract review followed by article retrieval and full-data extraction. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system was used for evidence rating incorporating strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.transplantjournal.com-
dc.relation.ispartofTransplantation-
dc.rightsThis is a non-final version of an article published in final form in (provide complete journal citation)-
dc.subjectablation therapy-
dc.subjectadjuvant chemoradiotherapy-
dc.subjectconsensus-
dc.subjectconsensus development-
dc.subjectdiagnosis-
dc.titlePosttransplant management of recipients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Working group report from the ILTS Transplant Oncology Consensus Conference-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailMan, K: kwanman@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMan, K=rp00417-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/TP.0000000000003196-
dc.identifier.pmid32217940-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85085263700-
dc.identifier.hkuros315044-
dc.identifier.volume104-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1143-
dc.identifier.epage1149-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats