File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Empathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view (a reply to L. A. Paul)

TitleEmpathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view (a reply to L. A. Paul)
Authors
KeywordsDe se
Tranformative experience
First person perspective
Empathy
Issue Date2017
Citation
Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 2017, v. 60, n. 3, p. 315-336 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. In her very interesting ‘First-personal modes of presentation and the problem of empathy’ (2017, 315–336), L. A. Paul argues that the phenomenon of empathy gives us reason to care about the first person point of view: that as theorists we can only understand, and as humans only evince, empathy by appealing to that point of view. We are skeptics about the importance of the first person point of view, although not about empathy. The goal of this paper is to see if we can account for empathy without the ideology of the first person. We conclude that we can.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286934
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.769
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCappelen, Herman-
dc.contributor.authorDever, Josh-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T11:46:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-07T11:46:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 2017, v. 60, n. 3, p. 315-336-
dc.identifier.issn0020-174X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286934-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. In her very interesting ‘First-personal modes of presentation and the problem of empathy’ (2017, 315–336), L. A. Paul argues that the phenomenon of empathy gives us reason to care about the first person point of view: that as theorists we can only understand, and as humans only evince, empathy by appealing to that point of view. We are skeptics about the importance of the first person point of view, although not about empathy. The goal of this paper is to see if we can account for empathy without the ideology of the first person. We conclude that we can.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy-
dc.subjectDe se-
dc.subjectTranformative experience-
dc.subjectFirst person perspective-
dc.subjectEmpathy-
dc.titleEmpathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view (a reply to L. A. Paul)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0020174X.2017.1262018-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85003875981-
dc.identifier.volume60-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage315-
dc.identifier.epage336-
dc.identifier.eissn1502-3923-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000396782500007-
dc.identifier.issnl0020-174X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats