File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31818526ec
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-67650599144
- PMID: 19158556
- WOS: WOS:000262844100006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Diamond burr polishing for recurrent corneal erosions: Results from a prospective randomized controlled trial
Title | Diamond burr polishing for recurrent corneal erosions: Results from a prospective randomized controlled trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Superficial keratectomy Diamond burr polishing Recurrent corneal erosion |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Citation | Cornea, 2009, v. 28, n. 2, p. 152-156 How to Cite? |
Abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of diamond burr polishing as an in-office treatment for recurrent corneal erosion (RCE). METHODS: A double-masked randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with RCE secondary to trauma or anterior basement membrane dystrophy underwent epithelial debridement (ED) or diamond burr superficial keratectomy (DBSK) at the slit lamp. Patients were followed up for 6 months, and the recurrence rates of RCE and visual outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients were recruited. The mean ± SD age was 38.3 ± 12.9 years. Twenty-five patients underwent DBSK, and 23 patients received ED alone. There was no significant difference in the baseline demographics between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly less major and minor recurrences and less need for repeated surgical interventions in the DBSK group compared with the ED group (P < 0.001). Eyes in the DBSK group also had significantly lower mean magnitude of astigmatism after treatment compared to the ED group (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Diamond burr polishing is a safe, convenient, and inexpensive treatment option for the management of RCE and resulted in better outcomes compared to simple epithelial debridement. © 2009 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286848 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.019 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Victoria W.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chi, Stanley C.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, Dennis S.C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-07T11:45:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-07T11:45:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Cornea, 2009, v. 28, n. 2, p. 152-156 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-3740 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286848 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of diamond burr polishing as an in-office treatment for recurrent corneal erosion (RCE). METHODS: A double-masked randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with RCE secondary to trauma or anterior basement membrane dystrophy underwent epithelial debridement (ED) or diamond burr superficial keratectomy (DBSK) at the slit lamp. Patients were followed up for 6 months, and the recurrence rates of RCE and visual outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients were recruited. The mean ± SD age was 38.3 ± 12.9 years. Twenty-five patients underwent DBSK, and 23 patients received ED alone. There was no significant difference in the baseline demographics between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly less major and minor recurrences and less need for repeated surgical interventions in the DBSK group compared with the ED group (P < 0.001). Eyes in the DBSK group also had significantly lower mean magnitude of astigmatism after treatment compared to the ED group (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Diamond burr polishing is a safe, convenient, and inexpensive treatment option for the management of RCE and resulted in better outcomes compared to simple epithelial debridement. © 2009 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cornea | - |
dc.subject | Superficial keratectomy | - |
dc.subject | Diamond burr polishing | - |
dc.subject | Recurrent corneal erosion | - |
dc.title | Diamond burr polishing for recurrent corneal erosions: Results from a prospective randomized controlled trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31818526ec | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19158556 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-67650599144 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 152 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 156 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000262844100006 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0277-3740 | - |