File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00219.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-60949360166
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Propositional skeletons and disquotational reports
Title | Propositional skeletons and disquotational reports |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Citation | Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, 2007, v. 107, n. 1 PART 2, p. 207-227 How to Cite? |
Abstract | One of the three central issues in Lloyd Humberstone's 'Sufficiency and Excess' is what he calls 'the Complete Thought Issue' (CTI, for short). This is the question of whether some declarative sentences have proposition radicals, rather than full-blown propositions, as their semantic values. My focus in this reply is exclusively on Humberstone's comments about CTI and on CTI more generally. The goal of Humberstone's discussion of CTI is to defend '[Kent] Bach's claim against Cappelen and Lepore's attacks' (Humberstone, 2006, p. 316). These 'attacks' on Bach are found in Cappelen and Lepore (2004). In section one I present CTI, in section two I evaluate Humberstone's defence of Bach, and in section three I discuss two solutions to CTI. ©2007 The Aristotelian Society. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286843 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.522 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cappelen, Herman | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-07T11:45:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-07T11:45:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, 2007, v. 107, n. 1 PART 2, p. 207-227 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0066-7374 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286843 | - |
dc.description.abstract | One of the three central issues in Lloyd Humberstone's 'Sufficiency and Excess' is what he calls 'the Complete Thought Issue' (CTI, for short). This is the question of whether some declarative sentences have proposition radicals, rather than full-blown propositions, as their semantic values. My focus in this reply is exclusively on Humberstone's comments about CTI and on CTI more generally. The goal of Humberstone's discussion of CTI is to defend '[Kent] Bach's claim against Cappelen and Lepore's attacks' (Humberstone, 2006, p. 316). These 'attacks' on Bach are found in Cappelen and Lepore (2004). In section one I present CTI, in section two I evaluate Humberstone's defence of Bach, and in section three I discuss two solutions to CTI. ©2007 The Aristotelian Society. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society | - |
dc.title | Propositional skeletons and disquotational reports | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00219.x | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-60949360166 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 107 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 PART 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 207 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 227 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0066-7374 | - |