File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Root fillings with a matched-taper single cone and two calcium silicate–based sealers: an analysis of voids using micro-computed tomography

TitleRoot fillings with a matched-taper single cone and two calcium silicate–based sealers: an analysis of voids using micro-computed tomography
Authors
KeywordsBioRoot RCS
GuttaFlow Bioseal
Micro-CT
Obturation
Voids
Issue Date2020
PublisherSpringer for German Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00784/index.htm
Citation
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, v. 24 n. 12, p. 4487-4492 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To compare the percentage of voids in matched-taper single-cone fillings with GuttaFlow Bioseal or BioRoot RCS root canal sealers, using micro-computed tomography. Materials and methods: Forty-eight single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared using rotary files and randomly allocated into 2 groups (n = 24), wherein the canals were filled with a matched-taper single gutta-percha cone and one of the two sealers: Group 1, GuttaFlow Bioseal and Group 2, BioRoot RCS. The specimens were scanned with micro-CT before and after root canal filling. A specialized software was used to calculate the voids volume percentage (V%) in the filling for the whole root canal, root canal thirds, and the last millimeter from the apex. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Results: Root canals filled with GuttaFlow Bioseal had significantly less V% than those filled with BioRoot RCS in all the root-thirds (p < 0.05) except at the apical 1 mm (p > 0.05). Comparing the root-thirds, GuttaFlow Bioseal showed similar V% in all regions (p > 0.05), while BioRoot RCS group had significantly greater V% in the coronal third compared with the other thirds (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Root canals filled with a matched-taper single cone and GuttaFlow Bioseal had significant less voids than those with BioRoot RCS, except at the apical 1 mm. Clinical relevance: Voids in root fillings have been reported to have a negative impact on root canal treatment. This study highlights the percentage of voids in root fillings composed of a single cone of gutta-percha with two types of calcium silicate–based bioceramic sealers.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286139
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.942
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPedullà, E-
dc.contributor.authorAbiad, RS-
dc.contributor.authorConte, G-
dc.contributor.authorLa Rosa, GRM-
dc.contributor.authorRapisarda, E-
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, P-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T06:59:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-31T06:59:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, 2020, v. 24 n. 12, p. 4487-4492-
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286139-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the percentage of voids in matched-taper single-cone fillings with GuttaFlow Bioseal or BioRoot RCS root canal sealers, using micro-computed tomography. Materials and methods: Forty-eight single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared using rotary files and randomly allocated into 2 groups (n = 24), wherein the canals were filled with a matched-taper single gutta-percha cone and one of the two sealers: Group 1, GuttaFlow Bioseal and Group 2, BioRoot RCS. The specimens were scanned with micro-CT before and after root canal filling. A specialized software was used to calculate the voids volume percentage (V%) in the filling for the whole root canal, root canal thirds, and the last millimeter from the apex. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Results: Root canals filled with GuttaFlow Bioseal had significantly less V% than those filled with BioRoot RCS in all the root-thirds (p < 0.05) except at the apical 1 mm (p > 0.05). Comparing the root-thirds, GuttaFlow Bioseal showed similar V% in all regions (p > 0.05), while BioRoot RCS group had significantly greater V% in the coronal third compared with the other thirds (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Root canals filled with a matched-taper single cone and GuttaFlow Bioseal had significant less voids than those with BioRoot RCS, except at the apical 1 mm. Clinical relevance: Voids in root fillings have been reported to have a negative impact on root canal treatment. This study highlights the percentage of voids in root fillings composed of a single cone of gutta-percha with two types of calcium silicate–based bioceramic sealers.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer for German Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00784/index.htm-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations-
dc.subjectBioRoot RCS-
dc.subjectGuttaFlow Bioseal-
dc.subjectMicro-CT-
dc.subjectObturation-
dc.subjectVoids-
dc.titleRoot fillings with a matched-taper single cone and two calcium silicate–based sealers: an analysis of voids using micro-computed tomography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailNeelakantan, P: prasanna@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityNeelakantan, P=rp02214-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-020-03313-5-
dc.identifier.pmid32382928-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85085080765-
dc.identifier.hkuros313136-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage4487-
dc.identifier.epage4492-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000530982800008-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.issnl1432-6981-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats