File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predicting spondylolisthesis correction with prone traction radiographs

TitlePredicting spondylolisthesis correction with prone traction radiographs
Authors
KeywordsSpondylolisthesis
Prone traction
TLIF
Interbody fusion
Spinal fusion
Issue Date2020
PublisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/
Citation
The Bone & Joint Journal, 2020, v. 102-B n. 8, p. 1062-1071 How to Cite?
AbstractAims: To determine the effectiveness of prone traction radiographs in predicting postoperative slip distance, slip angle, changes in disc height, and lordosis after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. Methods: A total of 63 consecutive patients with a degenerative spondylolisthesis and preoperative prone traction radiographs obtained since 2010 were studied. Slip distance, slip angle, disc height, segmental lordosis, and global lordosis (L1 to S1) were measured on preoperative lateral standing radiographs, flexion-extension lateral radiographs, prone traction lateral radiographs, and postoperative lateral standing radiographs. Patients were divided into two groups: posterolateral fusion or posterolateral fusion with interbody fusion. Results: The mean changes in segmental lordosis and global lordosis were 7.1° (SD 6.7°) and 2.9° (SD 9.9°) respectively for the interbody fusion group, and 0.8° (SD 5.1°) and -0.4° (SD 10.1°) respectively for the posterolateral fusion-only group. Segmental lordosis (ρ = 0.794, p < 0.001) corrected by interbody fusion correlated best with prone traction radiographs. Global lumbar lordosis (ρ = 0.788, p < 0.001) correlated best with the interbody fusion group and preoperative lateral standing radiographs. The least difference in slip distance (-0.3 mm (SD 1.7 mm), p < 0.001), slip angle (0.9° (SD 5.2°), p < 0.001), and disc height (0.02 mm (SD 2.4 mm), p < 0.001) was seen between prone traction and postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses suggested that prone traction parameters best predicted correction of slip distance (Corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) = 37.336) and disc height (AICc = 58.096), while correction of slip angle (AICc = 26.453) was best predicted by extension radiographs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) cut-off showed, with 68.3% sensitivity and 64.5% specificity, that to achieve a 3.0° increase in segmental lordotic angle, patients with a prone traction disc height of 8.5 mm needed an interbody fusion. Conclusion: Prone traction radiographs best predict the slip distance and disc height correction achieved by interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. To achieve this maximum correction, interbody fusion should be undertaken if a disc height of more than 8.5 mm is attained on preoperative prone traction radiographs. Level of Evidence: Level II Prognostic Study
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/285472
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.385
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.587
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, JPY-
dc.contributor.authorFong, HK-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, PWH-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-18T03:53:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-18T03:53:45Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2020, v. 102-B n. 8, p. 1062-1071-
dc.identifier.issn2049-4394-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/285472-
dc.description.abstractAims: To determine the effectiveness of prone traction radiographs in predicting postoperative slip distance, slip angle, changes in disc height, and lordosis after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. Methods: A total of 63 consecutive patients with a degenerative spondylolisthesis and preoperative prone traction radiographs obtained since 2010 were studied. Slip distance, slip angle, disc height, segmental lordosis, and global lordosis (L1 to S1) were measured on preoperative lateral standing radiographs, flexion-extension lateral radiographs, prone traction lateral radiographs, and postoperative lateral standing radiographs. Patients were divided into two groups: posterolateral fusion or posterolateral fusion with interbody fusion. Results: The mean changes in segmental lordosis and global lordosis were 7.1° (SD 6.7°) and 2.9° (SD 9.9°) respectively for the interbody fusion group, and 0.8° (SD 5.1°) and -0.4° (SD 10.1°) respectively for the posterolateral fusion-only group. Segmental lordosis (ρ = 0.794, p < 0.001) corrected by interbody fusion correlated best with prone traction radiographs. Global lumbar lordosis (ρ = 0.788, p < 0.001) correlated best with the interbody fusion group and preoperative lateral standing radiographs. The least difference in slip distance (-0.3 mm (SD 1.7 mm), p < 0.001), slip angle (0.9° (SD 5.2°), p < 0.001), and disc height (0.02 mm (SD 2.4 mm), p < 0.001) was seen between prone traction and postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses suggested that prone traction parameters best predicted correction of slip distance (Corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) = 37.336) and disc height (AICc = 58.096), while correction of slip angle (AICc = 26.453) was best predicted by extension radiographs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) cut-off showed, with 68.3% sensitivity and 64.5% specificity, that to achieve a 3.0° increase in segmental lordotic angle, patients with a prone traction disc height of 8.5 mm needed an interbody fusion. Conclusion: Prone traction radiographs best predict the slip distance and disc height correction achieved by interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. To achieve this maximum correction, interbody fusion should be undertaken if a disc height of more than 8.5 mm is attained on preoperative prone traction radiographs. Level of Evidence: Level II Prognostic Study-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Bone & Joint Journal-
dc.subjectSpondylolisthesis-
dc.subjectProne traction-
dc.subjectTLIF-
dc.subjectInterbody fusion-
dc.subjectSpinal fusion-
dc.titlePredicting spondylolisthesis correction with prone traction radiographs-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, JPY: cheungjp@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, PWH: gnuehcp6@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, JPY=rp01685-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2020-0528.R1-
dc.identifier.pmid32731831-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85088884740-
dc.identifier.hkuros312693-
dc.identifier.volume102-B-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage1062-
dc.identifier.epage1071-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000561876000013-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl2049-4394-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats