File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Nonrestorative sleep scale: a reliable and valid short form of the traditional Chinese version

TitleNonrestorative sleep scale: a reliable and valid short form of the traditional Chinese version
Authors
KeywordsItem response theory
Item selection
Nonrestorative sleep
Optimal test assembly
Reliability
Issue Date2020
PublisherSpringer Verlag Dordrecht. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0962-9343
Citation
Quality of Life Research, 2020, v. 29, p. 2585-2592 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Previous research has suggested the essential unidimensionality of the 12-item traditional Chinese version of the Nonrestorative Sleep Scale (NRSS). This study aimed to develop a short form of the traditional Chinese version of the NRSS without compromising its reliability and validity. Methods: Data were collected from 2 cross-sectional studies with identical target groups of adults residing in Hong Kong. An iterative Wald test was used to assess differential item functioning by gender. Based on the generalized partial credit model, we first obtained a shortened version such that further shortening would result in substantial sacrifice of test information and standard error of measurement. Another shortened version was obtained by the optimal test assembly (OTA). The two shortened versions were compared for test information, Cronbach’s alpha, and convergent validity. Results: Data from a total of 404 Chinese adults (60.0% female) who had completed the Chinese NRSS were gathered. All items were invariant by gender. A 6-item version was obtained beyond which the test performance substantially deteriorated, and a 9-item version was obtained by OTA. The 9-item version performed better than the 6-item version in test information and convergent validity. It had discrimination and difficulty indices ranging from 0.44 to 2.23 and − 7.58 to 2.13, respectively, and retained 92% of the test information of the original 12-item version. Conclusion: The 9-item Chinese NRSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure nonrestorative sleep for epidemiological studies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/285078
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 3.5
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.280
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLI, S-
dc.contributor.authorFong, DYT-
dc.contributor.authorWong, JYH-
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, K-
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, C-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, EPH-
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson,, B-
dc.contributor.authorLau, EYY-
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLK-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, LX-
dc.contributor.authorIp, MSM-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T09:06:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T09:06:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationQuality of Life Research, 2020, v. 29, p. 2585-2592-
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/285078-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Previous research has suggested the essential unidimensionality of the 12-item traditional Chinese version of the Nonrestorative Sleep Scale (NRSS). This study aimed to develop a short form of the traditional Chinese version of the NRSS without compromising its reliability and validity. Methods: Data were collected from 2 cross-sectional studies with identical target groups of adults residing in Hong Kong. An iterative Wald test was used to assess differential item functioning by gender. Based on the generalized partial credit model, we first obtained a shortened version such that further shortening would result in substantial sacrifice of test information and standard error of measurement. Another shortened version was obtained by the optimal test assembly (OTA). The two shortened versions were compared for test information, Cronbach’s alpha, and convergent validity. Results: Data from a total of 404 Chinese adults (60.0% female) who had completed the Chinese NRSS were gathered. All items were invariant by gender. A 6-item version was obtained beyond which the test performance substantially deteriorated, and a 9-item version was obtained by OTA. The 9-item version performed better than the 6-item version in test information and convergent validity. It had discrimination and difficulty indices ranging from 0.44 to 2.23 and − 7.58 to 2.13, respectively, and retained 92% of the test information of the original 12-item version. Conclusion: The 9-item Chinese NRSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure nonrestorative sleep for epidemiological studies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag Dordrecht. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0962-9343-
dc.relation.ispartofQuality of Life Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectItem response theory-
dc.subjectItem selection-
dc.subjectNonrestorative sleep-
dc.subjectOptimal test assembly-
dc.subjectReliability-
dc.titleNonrestorative sleep scale: a reliable and valid short form of the traditional Chinese version-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailFong, DYT: dytfong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, JYH: janetyh@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChoi, EPH: ephchoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLK: clklam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHuang, LX: lixi.huang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailIp, MSM: msmip@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFong, DYT=rp00253-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, JYH=rp01561-
dc.identifier.authorityChoi, EPH=rp02329-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLK=rp00350-
dc.identifier.authorityHuang, LX=rp00119-
dc.identifier.authorityIp, MSM=rp00347-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-020-02523-4-
dc.identifier.pmid32418061-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7434790-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85084807371-
dc.identifier.hkuros311667-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.spage2585-
dc.identifier.epage2592-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000533168700001-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-
dc.identifier.issnl0962-9343-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats