File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Conference Paper: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Collaborative Stepped Care Intervention for Late-life Depression

TitleCost-effectiveness Analysis of the Collaborative Stepped Care Intervention for Late-life Depression
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/innovateage/
Citation
The Gerontological Society of America (GSA) 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting: Strength in Age: Harnessing the Power of Networks, Austin, Texas, USA, 13-17 November 2019. In Innovation in Aging, 2019, v. 3 n. Suppl. 1, p. S876-S877 How to Cite?
AbstractLate-life depression is a burden on society because it is costly and have a significant adverse effect on the quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the collaborative stepped care intervention for depression among community-dwelling older adults compared to care as usual from a societal perspective. The intervention was piloted from 2016-2019 in Hong Kong. The study used a two-armed quasi-experimental design. Eventually, 412 older people were included (314 collaborative stepped care, 98 care as usual). Baseline measures and 12-month follow-up measures were assessed using questionnaires. We applied the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) and the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) respectively measuring quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and health care utilization. The average annual direct medical cost in the intervention group was USD 6,589 (95% C.I., 4,979 to 8,199) compared to US$ 6,167 (95% C.I., 3,702 to 8,631) in the care as usual group. The average QALYs gained was 0.036 higher in the collaborative stepped care group, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 11,722 per QALY, lower than the cost-effectiveness threshold suggested by The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The study showed that collaborative stepped care was a cost-effective intervention for late-life depression over service as usual.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284913
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.052

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, S-
dc.contributor.authorWong, GHY-
dc.contributor.authorLum, TYS-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, T-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T09:04:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T09:04:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe Gerontological Society of America (GSA) 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting: Strength in Age: Harnessing the Power of Networks, Austin, Texas, USA, 13-17 November 2019. In Innovation in Aging, 2019, v. 3 n. Suppl. 1, p. S876-S877-
dc.identifier.issn2399-5300-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284913-
dc.description.abstractLate-life depression is a burden on society because it is costly and have a significant adverse effect on the quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the collaborative stepped care intervention for depression among community-dwelling older adults compared to care as usual from a societal perspective. The intervention was piloted from 2016-2019 in Hong Kong. The study used a two-armed quasi-experimental design. Eventually, 412 older people were included (314 collaborative stepped care, 98 care as usual). Baseline measures and 12-month follow-up measures were assessed using questionnaires. We applied the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) and the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) respectively measuring quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and health care utilization. The average annual direct medical cost in the intervention group was USD 6,589 (95% C.I., 4,979 to 8,199) compared to US$ 6,167 (95% C.I., 3,702 to 8,631) in the care as usual group. The average QALYs gained was 0.036 higher in the collaborative stepped care group, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 11,722 per QALY, lower than the cost-effectiveness threshold suggested by The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The study showed that collaborative stepped care was a cost-effective intervention for late-life depression over service as usual.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/innovateage/-
dc.relation.ispartofInnovation in Aging-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Gerontological Society of America (GSA) 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting: Strength in Age—Harnessing the Power of Networks-
dc.titleCost-effectiveness Analysis of the Collaborative Stepped Care Intervention for Late-life Depression-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLu, S: sylu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, GHY: ghywong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLum, TYS: tlum@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLiu, T: tianyin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLu, S=rp02609-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, GHY=rp01850-
dc.identifier.authorityLum, TYS=rp01513-
dc.identifier.authorityLiu, T=rp02466-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/geroni/igz038.3213-
dc.identifier.hkuros312611-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl. 1-
dc.identifier.spageS876-
dc.identifier.epageS877-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl2399-5300-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats