File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: UNCITRAL's Engagement in African and Latin American Dispute Resolution Reform

TitleUNCITRAL's Engagement in African and Latin American Dispute Resolution Reform
Authors
KeywordsUNCITRAL
Dispute Resolution
Latin America
Africa
Legal Reform
Regional Integration
Legal Harmonization
Diversity
Issue Date2020
PublisherThe Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. The Journal's web site is located at https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/osjdr/
Citation
Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2020, v. 35 n. 3, p. 289-310 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article examines the impact of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) on dispute resolution law reforms in Africa and Latin America. Using the prism of regional coordinating activities, regional law reforms, and domestic law reforms in the two regions, it offers insights into the potential of UNCITRAL’s soft law instruments in shaping institutional and legal development in dispute resolution in the region. While legislative efforts indicating heightened attention to advancing dispute resolution practice in these regions have been on-going, continued scope for integrating standards of transparency and enforcement of awards exists. The essay is divided in four parts. In part one, we present a background situational analysis of the development of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, specifically arbitration and conciliation, in the areas of investor-state and direct foreign investments generally in both regions. In the second part, we highlight the various regional UNCITRAL conferences, intersession meetings and stakeholder engagements in both Africa and Latin America in a bid to assess regional and international efforts toward reform and addressing the diverse challenges faced in both regions in the adoption and implementation of UNCITRAL soft-law instruments. In the third part, we highlight specific efforts at adopting UNCITRAL soft law in the two regions and their impact on dispute resolution developments. We deliberately emphasise here the possible impact on arbitration rules, arbitration law, transparency rules, conciliation rules, and investor-state arbitration reform. In the last part, we examine some of the challenges faced by African and Latin American States in the implementation of UNCITRAL soft law, and suggest a preliminary reform menu that could be considered by UNCITRAL and other stakeholders in ongoing efforts to reform dispute resolution systems in the two regions along the lines of UNCITRAL soft law.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283556
ISSN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, S-
dc.contributor.authorKomolo, E-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-29T02:06:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-29T02:06:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationOhio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2020, v. 35 n. 3, p. 289-310-
dc.identifier.issn1046-4344-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283556-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the impact of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) on dispute resolution law reforms in Africa and Latin America. Using the prism of regional coordinating activities, regional law reforms, and domestic law reforms in the two regions, it offers insights into the potential of UNCITRAL’s soft law instruments in shaping institutional and legal development in dispute resolution in the region. While legislative efforts indicating heightened attention to advancing dispute resolution practice in these regions have been on-going, continued scope for integrating standards of transparency and enforcement of awards exists. The essay is divided in four parts. In part one, we present a background situational analysis of the development of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, specifically arbitration and conciliation, in the areas of investor-state and direct foreign investments generally in both regions. In the second part, we highlight the various regional UNCITRAL conferences, intersession meetings and stakeholder engagements in both Africa and Latin America in a bid to assess regional and international efforts toward reform and addressing the diverse challenges faced in both regions in the adoption and implementation of UNCITRAL soft-law instruments. In the third part, we highlight specific efforts at adopting UNCITRAL soft law in the two regions and their impact on dispute resolution developments. We deliberately emphasise here the possible impact on arbitration rules, arbitration law, transparency rules, conciliation rules, and investor-state arbitration reform. In the last part, we examine some of the challenges faced by African and Latin American States in the implementation of UNCITRAL soft law, and suggest a preliminary reform menu that could be considered by UNCITRAL and other stakeholders in ongoing efforts to reform dispute resolution systems in the two regions along the lines of UNCITRAL soft law.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. The Journal's web site is located at https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/osjdr/-
dc.relation.ispartofOhio State Journal on Dispute Resolution-
dc.subjectUNCITRAL-
dc.subjectDispute Resolution-
dc.subjectLatin America-
dc.subjectAfrica-
dc.subjectLegal Reform-
dc.subjectRegional Integration-
dc.subjectLegal Harmonization-
dc.subjectDiversity-
dc.titleUNCITRAL's Engagement in African and Latin American Dispute Resolution Reform-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailAli, S: sali@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityAli, S=rp01236-
dc.identifier.hkuros311926-
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage289-
dc.identifier.epage310-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.ssrn3609632-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2020/029-
dc.identifier.issnl1046-4344-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats