File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: DPP4i, thiazolidinediones, or insulin and risks of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy with inadequate control

TitleDPP4i, thiazolidinediones, or insulin and risks of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy with inadequate control
Authors
Keywordscancer
insulin
thiazolidinediones
type 2 diabetes
Issue Date2020
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group: Open Access. The Journal's web site is located at http://drc.bmj.com/
Citation
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 2020, v. 8 n. 1, p. article no. e001346 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction This study aims to compare the risks of cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy intensified with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), thiazolidinediones, or insulin. Research design and methods We assembled a retrospective cohort data of 20 577 patients who were free of cancer and on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy, and whose drug treatments were intensified with DPP4i (n=9957), insulin (n=7760), or thiazolidinediones (n=2860) from January 2006 to December 2017. Propensity-score weighting was used to balance out baseline covariates across the three groups. HRs for any types of cancer, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models. Results Over a mean follow-up period of 34 months with 58 539 person-years, cumulative incidences of cancer, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were 0.028, 0.009, and 0.072, respectively. Patients intensified with insulin had the highest incidence of all-cause mortality (incidence rate=3.22/100 person-years) and the insulin itself posed the greatest risk (HR 2.46, 95% CI 2.25 to 2.70, p<0.001; 2.44, 95% CI 2.23 to 2.67) compared with thiazolidinediones and DPP4i, respectively. Comparing between thiazolidinediones and DPP4i, thiazolidinediones was associated with higher risk of cancer (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.63) but not cancer mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.58) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.11). Insulin was associated with the greatest risk of cancer mortality (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.71; 1.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.07) compared with thiazolidinediones and DPP4i, respectively. Conclusions For patients with T2DM on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy, the addition of DPP4i was the third-line medication least likely to be associated with cancer mortality and cancer effect among three options, and posed no increased risk for all-cause mortality when compared with thiazolidinediones.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283254
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.479
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, CKH-
dc.contributor.authorMan, KCK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, EWY-
dc.contributor.authorWU, T-
dc.contributor.authorTse, ETY-
dc.contributor.authorWong, ICK-
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLK-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T02:54:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-22T02:54:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 2020, v. 8 n. 1, p. article no. e001346-
dc.identifier.issn2052-4897-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283254-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction This study aims to compare the risks of cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy intensified with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), thiazolidinediones, or insulin. Research design and methods We assembled a retrospective cohort data of 20 577 patients who were free of cancer and on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy, and whose drug treatments were intensified with DPP4i (n=9957), insulin (n=7760), or thiazolidinediones (n=2860) from January 2006 to December 2017. Propensity-score weighting was used to balance out baseline covariates across the three groups. HRs for any types of cancer, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models. Results Over a mean follow-up period of 34 months with 58 539 person-years, cumulative incidences of cancer, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were 0.028, 0.009, and 0.072, respectively. Patients intensified with insulin had the highest incidence of all-cause mortality (incidence rate=3.22/100 person-years) and the insulin itself posed the greatest risk (HR 2.46, 95% CI 2.25 to 2.70, p<0.001; 2.44, 95% CI 2.23 to 2.67) compared with thiazolidinediones and DPP4i, respectively. Comparing between thiazolidinediones and DPP4i, thiazolidinediones was associated with higher risk of cancer (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.63) but not cancer mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.58) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.11). Insulin was associated with the greatest risk of cancer mortality (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.71; 1.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.07) compared with thiazolidinediones and DPP4i, respectively. Conclusions For patients with T2DM on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy, the addition of DPP4i was the third-line medication least likely to be associated with cancer mortality and cancer effect among three options, and posed no increased risk for all-cause mortality when compared with thiazolidinediones.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group: Open Access. The Journal's web site is located at http://drc.bmj.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcancer-
dc.subjectinsulin-
dc.subjectthiazolidinediones-
dc.subjecttype 2 diabetes-
dc.titleDPP4i, thiazolidinediones, or insulin and risks of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin–sulfonylurea dual therapy with inadequate control-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, CKH: carlosho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailMan, KCK: mkckth@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, EWY: ewchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTse, ETY: emilyht@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, ICK: wongick@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLK: clklam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, CKH=rp01931-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, EWY=rp01587-
dc.identifier.authorityTse, ETY=rp02382-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, ICK=rp01480-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLK=rp00350-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001346-
dc.identifier.pmid32532851-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7295418-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85086605388-
dc.identifier.hkuros310448-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e001346-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e001346-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000573913300008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl2052-4897-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats