File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of changing case definitions for COVID-19 on the epidemic curve and transmission parameters in mainland China: a modelling study

TitleEffect of changing case definitions for COVID-19 on the epidemic curve and transmission parameters in mainland China: a modelling study
Authors
Keywordsbasic reproduction number
China
coronavirus disease 2019
credible interval
disease transmission
Issue Date2020
PublisherThe Lancet Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/issue/current
Citation
The Lancet Public Health, 2020, v. 5 n. 5, p. e289-e296 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: When a new infectious disease emerges, appropriate case definitions are important for clinical diagnosis and for public health surveillance. Tracking case numbers over time is important to establish the speed of spread and the effectiveness of interventions. We aimed to assess whether changes in case definitions affected inferences on the transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Methods: We examined changes in the case definition for COVID-19 in mainland China during the first epidemic wave. We used exponential growth models to estimate how changes in the case definitions affected the number of cases reported each day. We then inferred how the epidemic curve would have appeared if the same case definition had been used throughout the epidemic. Findings: From Jan 15 to March 3, 2020, seven versions of the case definition for COVID-19 were issued by the National Health Commission in China. We estimated that when the case definitions were changed, the proportion of infections being detected as cases increased by 7·1 times (95% credible interval [CrI] 4·8–10·9) from version 1 to 2, 2·8 times (1·9–4·2) from version 2 to 4, and 4·2 times (2·6–7·3) from version 4 to 5. If the fifth version of the case definition had been applied throughout the outbreak with sufficient testing capacity, we estimated that by Feb 20, 2020, there would have been 232000 (95% CrI 161000–359000) confirmed cases in China as opposed to the 55508 confirmed cases reported. Interpretation: The case definition was initially narrow and was gradually broadened to allow detection of more cases as knowledge increased, particularly milder cases and those without epidemiological links to Wuhan, China, or other known cases. These changes should be taken into account when making inferences on epidemic growth rates and doubling times, and therefore on the reproductive number, to avoid bias. Funding: Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/282832
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 72.427
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 7.226
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsang, TK-
dc.contributor.authorWu, P-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLau, EHY-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, GM-
dc.contributor.authorCowling, BJ-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-05T06:22:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-05T06:22:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Public Health, 2020, v. 5 n. 5, p. e289-e296-
dc.identifier.issn2468-2667-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/282832-
dc.description.abstractBackground: When a new infectious disease emerges, appropriate case definitions are important for clinical diagnosis and for public health surveillance. Tracking case numbers over time is important to establish the speed of spread and the effectiveness of interventions. We aimed to assess whether changes in case definitions affected inferences on the transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Methods: We examined changes in the case definition for COVID-19 in mainland China during the first epidemic wave. We used exponential growth models to estimate how changes in the case definitions affected the number of cases reported each day. We then inferred how the epidemic curve would have appeared if the same case definition had been used throughout the epidemic. Findings: From Jan 15 to March 3, 2020, seven versions of the case definition for COVID-19 were issued by the National Health Commission in China. We estimated that when the case definitions were changed, the proportion of infections being detected as cases increased by 7·1 times (95% credible interval [CrI] 4·8–10·9) from version 1 to 2, 2·8 times (1·9–4·2) from version 2 to 4, and 4·2 times (2·6–7·3) from version 4 to 5. If the fifth version of the case definition had been applied throughout the outbreak with sufficient testing capacity, we estimated that by Feb 20, 2020, there would have been 232000 (95% CrI 161000–359000) confirmed cases in China as opposed to the 55508 confirmed cases reported. Interpretation: The case definition was initially narrow and was gradually broadened to allow detection of more cases as knowledge increased, particularly milder cases and those without epidemiological links to Wuhan, China, or other known cases. These changes should be taken into account when making inferences on epidemic growth rates and doubling times, and therefore on the reproductive number, to avoid bias. Funding: Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe Lancet Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/issue/current-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Public Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbasic reproduction number-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectcoronavirus disease 2019-
dc.subjectcredible interval-
dc.subjectdisease transmission-
dc.titleEffect of changing case definitions for COVID-19 on the epidemic curve and transmission parameters in mainland China: a modelling study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTsang, TK: matklab@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWu, P: pengwu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLin, Y: vanialin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLau, EHY: ehylau@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, GM: gmleung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCowling, BJ: bcowling@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTsang, TK=rp02571-
dc.identifier.authorityWu, P=rp02025-
dc.identifier.authorityLau, EHY=rp01349-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, GM=rp00460-
dc.identifier.authorityCowling, BJ=rp01326-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30089-X-
dc.identifier.pmid32330458-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7173814-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85083676940-
dc.identifier.hkuros310172-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spagee289-
dc.identifier.epagee296-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000531073600022-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl2468-2667-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats