File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements

TitleAdhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements
Authors
Keywordsadhesion
glass fiber post
resin cement
self-adhesive
push out
Issue Date2019
PublisherMDPI AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry
Citation
Dentistry Journal, 2019, v. 7, p. 80 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/281782
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.553
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOzlek, E-
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, P-
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, JP-
dc.contributor.authorBelli, S-
dc.contributor.authorUgur, M-
dc.contributor.authorKavut, I-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-27T04:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-27T04:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationDentistry Journal, 2019, v. 7, p. 80-
dc.identifier.issn2304-6767-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/281782-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMDPI AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry-
dc.relation.ispartofDentistry Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectadhesion-
dc.subjectglass fiber post-
dc.subjectresin cement-
dc.subjectself-adhesive-
dc.subjectpush out-
dc.titleAdhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailNeelakantan, P: prasanna@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, JP: jpmat@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityNeelakantan, P=rp02214-
dc.identifier.authorityMatinlinna, JP=rp00052-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj7030080-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85070063480-
dc.identifier.hkuros309497-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.spage80-
dc.identifier.epage80-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000697623300018-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-
dc.identifier.issnl2304-6767-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats