File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3390/dj7030080
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85070063480
- WOS: WOS:000697623300018
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements
Title | Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | adhesion glass fiber post resin cement self-adhesive push out |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | MDPI AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry |
Citation | Dentistry Journal, 2019, v. 7, p. 80 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281782 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.553 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ozlek, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Neelakantan, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Matinlinna, JP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Belli, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ugur, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kavut, I | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-27T04:22:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-27T04:22:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Dentistry Journal, 2019, v. 7, p. 80 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2304-6767 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281782 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Dentistry Journal | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | adhesion | - |
dc.subject | glass fiber post | - |
dc.subject | resin cement | - |
dc.subject | self-adhesive | - |
dc.subject | push out | - |
dc.title | Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Neelakantan, P: prasanna@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Matinlinna, JP: jpmat@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Neelakantan, P=rp02214 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Matinlinna, JP=rp00052 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/dj7030080 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85070063480 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 309497 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 80 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 80 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000697623300018 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Switzerland | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2304-6767 | - |