File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleEffect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
电子医疗心脏康复对冠心病患者健康结果的影响:系统评估与荟萃分析
Authors
Keywordssystematic review
nursing
meta-analysis
eHealth
coronary heart disease
cardiac rehabilitation
Issue Date2020
Citation
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2020, v. 76, n. 3, p. 754-772 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Aims: To evaluate the effects of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients and to identify programme design, which may lead to more effective health benefits. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data sources: Medline, EMBASE, CLNAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails, PubMed and CNKI were searched over the period from 1806 to April 2019. Review methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to examine the effect of eHealth CR on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients. We used RevMan 5.3 for risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis and GRADE software for generating findings. Results: In all, 14 trials with 1,783 participants were included. eHealth CR has significantly promoted duration of physical activity, daily steps, quality of life (QoL) and re-hospitalization. Using comparative analysis of programme design elements, including mode of delivery, intervention content, motivational strategies and social support, between the effective and ineffective eHealth CR, it was found that comprehensive empowerment strategies and follow-up care by tele-monitoring may be the crucial characteristics leading to more favourable treatment effect. Conclusion: eHealth CR is effective in engaging patients in active lifestyle, improving QoL and reducing re-hospitalization. Future research needs to test the effects of comprehensive CR programmes by incorporating empowerment strategies and tele-monitoring as active components. Impact: eHealth has been increasingly applied to increase accessibility and uptake of CR. Integrative evidence to indicate its effects on health outcomes is lacking. This review identified its positive effects on some behavioural, psychosocial and health service use outcomes. Together with insights about which programme design elements may positively shape the outcomes, this review informs the role and practice of cardiovascular nurses in promoting evidence-based eHealth CR.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/281010
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.218
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSu, Jing Jing-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Doris Sau Fung-
dc.contributor.authorPaguio, Jenniffer Torralba-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T04:11:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-26T04:11:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2020, v. 76, n. 3, p. 754-772-
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/281010-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Aims: To evaluate the effects of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients and to identify programme design, which may lead to more effective health benefits. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data sources: Medline, EMBASE, CLNAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails, PubMed and CNKI were searched over the period from 1806 to April 2019. Review methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to examine the effect of eHealth CR on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients. We used RevMan 5.3 for risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis and GRADE software for generating findings. Results: In all, 14 trials with 1,783 participants were included. eHealth CR has significantly promoted duration of physical activity, daily steps, quality of life (QoL) and re-hospitalization. Using comparative analysis of programme design elements, including mode of delivery, intervention content, motivational strategies and social support, between the effective and ineffective eHealth CR, it was found that comprehensive empowerment strategies and follow-up care by tele-monitoring may be the crucial characteristics leading to more favourable treatment effect. Conclusion: eHealth CR is effective in engaging patients in active lifestyle, improving QoL and reducing re-hospitalization. Future research needs to test the effects of comprehensive CR programmes by incorporating empowerment strategies and tele-monitoring as active components. Impact: eHealth has been increasingly applied to increase accessibility and uptake of CR. Integrative evidence to indicate its effects on health outcomes is lacking. This review identified its positive effects on some behavioural, psychosocial and health service use outcomes. Together with insights about which programme design elements may positively shape the outcomes, this review informs the role and practice of cardiovascular nurses in promoting evidence-based eHealth CR.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Nursing-
dc.subjectsystematic review-
dc.subjectnursing-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.subjecteHealth-
dc.subjectcoronary heart disease-
dc.subjectcardiac rehabilitation-
dc.titleEffect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.title电子医疗心脏康复对冠心病患者健康结果的影响:系统评估与荟萃分析-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.14272-
dc.identifier.pmid31769527-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85079320766-
dc.identifier.hkuros317126-
dc.identifier.volume76-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage754-
dc.identifier.epage772-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2648-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000510568900001-
dc.identifier.issnl0309-2402-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats