File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Co-adminstration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol

TitleCo-adminstration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol
Authors
Issue Date2002
Citation
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2002, v. 49, n. 5, p. 508-512 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) requires sufficient depth of anesthesia to relax the jaw and obtund airway reflexes. Recent studies suggest that the short-acting opioid alfentanil provides the best insertion conditions. We therefore compared the insertion conditions following co-administration of alfentanil-propofol with more commonly used fentanyl-propofol. Methods: One hundred forty ASA I or II patients, age 18-81 yr, requiring minor surgery were recruited. They were randomized to receive either alfentanil (10 μg·kg-1; n = 73) or fentanyl (1 μg·kg-1; n = 67) with propofol (2.5 mg·kg-1) 90 sec prior to LMA (size 3 or 4) insertion. A six variable (mouth opening, ease of insertion, swallowing, coughing, movement and laryngospasm) three-point (nil / partial / total) score was used to assess insertion conditions. Duration of postinsertion apnea was recorded. Insertion conditions were compared using Chi-square for trends. Results: The two groups were demographically similar. Mouth opening and ease of insertion were not improved with alfentanil co-administration. Alfentanil-propofol reduced the incidence of swallowing, gagging, movement and laryngospasm (P < 0.05), with 29% (alfentanil) compared to 45% (fentanyl) of patients responding (P = 0.05) to LMA insertion. Apnea [mean (SD)] following alfentanil lasted 154 (139) sec compared to 82 (61) sec following fentanyl (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol provided better insertion conditions than fentanyl-propofol, though apnea was prolonged by 72 sec.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280512
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.924
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, Jacqueline K.L.-
dc.contributor.authorCritchley, Lester A.H.-
dc.contributor.authorKarmakar, Manoj K.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Patrick K.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T14:34:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T14:34:13Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2002, v. 49, n. 5, p. 508-512-
dc.identifier.issn0832-610X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280512-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) requires sufficient depth of anesthesia to relax the jaw and obtund airway reflexes. Recent studies suggest that the short-acting opioid alfentanil provides the best insertion conditions. We therefore compared the insertion conditions following co-administration of alfentanil-propofol with more commonly used fentanyl-propofol. Methods: One hundred forty ASA I or II patients, age 18-81 yr, requiring minor surgery were recruited. They were randomized to receive either alfentanil (10 μg·kg-1; n = 73) or fentanyl (1 μg·kg-1; n = 67) with propofol (2.5 mg·kg-1) 90 sec prior to LMA (size 3 or 4) insertion. A six variable (mouth opening, ease of insertion, swallowing, coughing, movement and laryngospasm) three-point (nil / partial / total) score was used to assess insertion conditions. Duration of postinsertion apnea was recorded. Insertion conditions were compared using Chi-square for trends. Results: The two groups were demographically similar. Mouth opening and ease of insertion were not improved with alfentanil co-administration. Alfentanil-propofol reduced the incidence of swallowing, gagging, movement and laryngospasm (P < 0.05), with 29% (alfentanil) compared to 45% (fentanyl) of patients responding (P = 0.05) to LMA insertion. Apnea [mean (SD)] following alfentanil lasted 154 (139) sec compared to 82 (61) sec following fentanyl (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol provided better insertion conditions than fentanyl-propofol, though apnea was prolonged by 72 sec.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Journal of Anesthesia-
dc.titleCo-adminstration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF03017932-
dc.identifier.pmid11983670-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036017679-
dc.identifier.volume49-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage508-
dc.identifier.epage512-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000175508400017-
dc.identifier.issnl0832-610X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats