File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Patient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: Comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes

TitlePatient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: Comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes
Authors
KeywordsPain: postoperative
Analgesics: pethidine
Analgesia: patient-controlled analgesia
Issue Date2001
Citation
Anaesthesia, 2001, v. 56, n. 11, p. 1106-1112 How to Cite?
AbstractWe compared epidural (n = 17) and intravenous (n = 20) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using pethidine (bolus 10 mg, lockout interval 10 min, 4-h maximum dose 3 mg.kg-1) after total gastrectomy. We found that mean (SD) pethidine consumption in the first 24 h was 33% less in the epidural group [255 (85) mg] than in the intravenous group [379 (129) mg, p = 0.002], although most of this difference occurred in the first 8 h. Plasma concentrations of pethidine were lower at 8 h (p < 0.01) in the epidural group, but were similar at 24 h. Pain scores, side-effects, patient satisfaction and patient outcome were similar between groups. Epidural and intravenous pethidine PCA provided similar efficacy after major abdominal surgery, although the epidural route can reduce the amount of pethidine used initially.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280509
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.400
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, P. P.-
dc.contributor.authorCheam, E. W.-
dc.contributor.authorMa, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, K. K.-
dc.contributor.authorNgan Kee, W. D.-
dc.contributor.authorGin, T.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T14:34:13Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T14:34:13Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia, 2001, v. 56, n. 11, p. 1106-1112-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280509-
dc.description.abstractWe compared epidural (n = 17) and intravenous (n = 20) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using pethidine (bolus 10 mg, lockout interval 10 min, 4-h maximum dose 3 mg.kg-1) after total gastrectomy. We found that mean (SD) pethidine consumption in the first 24 h was 33% less in the epidural group [255 (85) mg] than in the intravenous group [379 (129) mg, p = 0.002], although most of this difference occurred in the first 8 h. Plasma concentrations of pethidine were lower at 8 h (p < 0.01) in the epidural group, but were similar at 24 h. Pain scores, side-effects, patient satisfaction and patient outcome were similar between groups. Epidural and intravenous pethidine PCA provided similar efficacy after major abdominal surgery, although the epidural route can reduce the amount of pethidine used initially.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesia-
dc.subjectPain: postoperative-
dc.subjectAnalgesics: pethidine-
dc.subjectAnalgesia: patient-controlled analgesia-
dc.titlePatient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: Comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2044.2001.1962-4.x-
dc.identifier.pmid11703246-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0034754944-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1106-
dc.identifier.epage1112-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000172147700014-
dc.identifier.issnl0003-2409-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats