File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The impact of supplementary immunization activities on routine vaccination coverage: An instrumental variable analysis in five low-income countries

TitleThe impact of supplementary immunization activities on routine vaccination coverage: An instrumental variable analysis in five low-income countries
Authors
Issue Date2019
Citation
PLoS ONE, 2019, v. 14, n. 2, article no. e0212049 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019 Chakrabarti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Countries deliver vaccines either through routine health services or supplementary immunization activities (SIAs), usually community-based or door-to-door immunization campaigns. While SIAs have been successful at increasing coverage of vaccines in low- and middle-income countries, they may disrupt the delivery of routine health services. We examine the impact of SIAs on routine vaccine coverage in five low-income countries. Methods Data on the number and timing of SIAs conducted in various countries was compiled by WHO and obtained through UNICEF. Information on the coverage of vaccines not targeted by SIAs (e.g., DPT) was extracted from the Demographic and Health Surveys. We focus on SIAs that took place between 1996 and 2013 in Bangladesh, Senegal, Togo, Gambia, and Cote d’Ivoire, and examine outcomes for children aged 12–59 months. To avoid biases resulting from non-random placement and timing of SIAs, we use age of a child at her first SIA as an instrumental variable for total exposure to SIAs. Results We find that SIA exposure reduced the likelihood of receiving routine vaccines in all the countries included in the study; the coefficients of interest are however statistically insignificant for Gambia and Cote d’Ivoire. In countries that witnessed statistically significant SIA-induced declines in the likelihood of obtaining DPT 3, measles as well as BCG, reductions ranged from 1.3 percentage points (Senegal) to 5.5 percentage points (Bangladesh). Conclusion SIA exposure reduced routine vaccination rates in study countries. Efforts should be made to limit the detrimental impact of SIAs on the services provided by routine health systems.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280490
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarti, Averi-
dc.contributor.authorGrépin, Karen A.-
dc.contributor.authorHelleringer, Stéphane-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T14:34:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T14:34:10Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2019, v. 14, n. 2, article no. e0212049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280490-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Chakrabarti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Countries deliver vaccines either through routine health services or supplementary immunization activities (SIAs), usually community-based or door-to-door immunization campaigns. While SIAs have been successful at increasing coverage of vaccines in low- and middle-income countries, they may disrupt the delivery of routine health services. We examine the impact of SIAs on routine vaccine coverage in five low-income countries. Methods Data on the number and timing of SIAs conducted in various countries was compiled by WHO and obtained through UNICEF. Information on the coverage of vaccines not targeted by SIAs (e.g., DPT) was extracted from the Demographic and Health Surveys. We focus on SIAs that took place between 1996 and 2013 in Bangladesh, Senegal, Togo, Gambia, and Cote d’Ivoire, and examine outcomes for children aged 12–59 months. To avoid biases resulting from non-random placement and timing of SIAs, we use age of a child at her first SIA as an instrumental variable for total exposure to SIAs. Results We find that SIA exposure reduced the likelihood of receiving routine vaccines in all the countries included in the study; the coefficients of interest are however statistically insignificant for Gambia and Cote d’Ivoire. In countries that witnessed statistically significant SIA-induced declines in the likelihood of obtaining DPT 3, measles as well as BCG, reductions ranged from 1.3 percentage points (Senegal) to 5.5 percentage points (Bangladesh). Conclusion SIA exposure reduced routine vaccination rates in study countries. Efforts should be made to limit the detrimental impact of SIAs on the services provided by routine health systems.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleThe impact of supplementary immunization activities on routine vaccination coverage: An instrumental variable analysis in five low-income countries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0212049-
dc.identifier.pmid30763389-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6375584-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85061506591-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e0212049-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e0212049-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000458763900035-
dc.identifier.issnl1932-6203-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats