File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A continuous quality improvement project

TitleA continuous quality improvement project
Authors
KeywordsInterdisciplinary communication
Education
Clinical governance
Quality improvement
Patient safety
Issue Date2014
Citation
British Journal of Health Care Management, 2014, v. 20, n. 3, p. 132-141 How to Cite?
AbstractHospital Authority (HA), a statutory body responsible for managing public healthcare in Hong Kong, provides 90% of inpatient hospital services. The Surgical Outcomes Monitoring and Improvement Program was launched to monitor and improve the surgical outcomes of patients managed under HA. Tuen Mun Hospital, the largest acute hospital in Hong Kong, was committed to implement quality improvement projects to improve patients' outcomes after reviewing the first report in 2010. Other than the possibility of surgical technique failure, there were multiple cultural and managerial problems recognised, which could have contributed to the suboptimal outcome. The Surgical Quality and Safety Circle was formed, and was composed of hospital administrators and consultants from departments of surgery, anaesthesia and intensive care, and aimed to create a patient-centered culture. It also aimed to improve the fundamental standards of services provided, promote inter-departmental co-ordination and communication, ensure continuous medical education, and discuss policies and strategies regarding patient service management. Members attended meetings every four-to-six weeks, in which complicated cases were discussed. The four main areas focused on during case discussion were: interdisciplinary communication; logistics, workflow and policy making; continuous professional education; and improving communication between hospital management and clinicians. As a strategy for change, the 'Speak up culture', which was under-developed in the locality, was promoted. 400 comments and suggestions had been arrived at during group discussion across 25 meetings since February 2011. There were more than 10 inter-departmental and hospital based improvement programmes successfully implemented based on the clinical and system weakness identified in the meetings. © 2014 MA Healthcare Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280480
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.178

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJasperine Ho, Ka Yee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Quinnie-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Ka Chi-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Kwok Key-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Siu Kee-
dc.contributor.authorMan, Chi Wai-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Kam Shing-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Chi Yeun-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T14:34:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T14:34:08Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Health Care Management, 2014, v. 20, n. 3, p. 132-141-
dc.identifier.issn1358-0574-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280480-
dc.description.abstractHospital Authority (HA), a statutory body responsible for managing public healthcare in Hong Kong, provides 90% of inpatient hospital services. The Surgical Outcomes Monitoring and Improvement Program was launched to monitor and improve the surgical outcomes of patients managed under HA. Tuen Mun Hospital, the largest acute hospital in Hong Kong, was committed to implement quality improvement projects to improve patients' outcomes after reviewing the first report in 2010. Other than the possibility of surgical technique failure, there were multiple cultural and managerial problems recognised, which could have contributed to the suboptimal outcome. The Surgical Quality and Safety Circle was formed, and was composed of hospital administrators and consultants from departments of surgery, anaesthesia and intensive care, and aimed to create a patient-centered culture. It also aimed to improve the fundamental standards of services provided, promote inter-departmental co-ordination and communication, ensure continuous medical education, and discuss policies and strategies regarding patient service management. Members attended meetings every four-to-six weeks, in which complicated cases were discussed. The four main areas focused on during case discussion were: interdisciplinary communication; logistics, workflow and policy making; continuous professional education; and improving communication between hospital management and clinicians. As a strategy for change, the 'Speak up culture', which was under-developed in the locality, was promoted. 400 comments and suggestions had been arrived at during group discussion across 25 meetings since February 2011. There were more than 10 inter-departmental and hospital based improvement programmes successfully implemented based on the clinical and system weakness identified in the meetings. © 2014 MA Healthcare Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Health Care Management-
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary communication-
dc.subjectEducation-
dc.subjectClinical governance-
dc.subjectQuality improvement-
dc.subjectPatient safety-
dc.titleA continuous quality improvement project-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.12968/bjhc.2014.20.3.132-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84902122980-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage132-
dc.identifier.epage141-
dc.identifier.issnl1358-0574-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats