File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bid-taker power and supply base diversification

TitleBid-taker power and supply base diversification
Authors
KeywordsProcurement auctions
Supply base design
Bid-taker power
Issue Date2014
Citation
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2014, v. 16, n. 2, p. 300-314 How to Cite?
AbstractWe study a buyer who periodically auctions off short-term supply contracts among her supply base. To mitigate significant cost shocks to procurement, the buyer can diversify her supply base by selecting suppliers from different regions. We find that the buyer's decision to diversify depends on her bid-taker power-that is, her ability to choose the auction mechanism. At one extreme, when the buyer has full bid-taker power and thus can dictatorially implement the optimal mechanism, she always prefers to diversify. At the other extreme, when the buyer uses a reverse English auction with no reserve price due to her lack of bid-taker power, she generally prefers to protect herself against potential price escalation from cost-advantaged suppliers by diversifying less. The managerial insight is that the more bid-taker power the buyer has to control price escalation from cost-advantaged suppliers the more she prefers a diversified supply base. This insight is shown to be robust to correlation between regional costs, ex ante asymmetry between regions, and intermediate levels of bid-taker power. © 2014 INFORMS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280144
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.466
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, Zhixi-
dc.contributor.authorBeil, Damian R.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-06T02:07:30Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-06T02:07:30Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationManufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2014, v. 16, n. 2, p. 300-314-
dc.identifier.issn1523-4614-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280144-
dc.description.abstractWe study a buyer who periodically auctions off short-term supply contracts among her supply base. To mitigate significant cost shocks to procurement, the buyer can diversify her supply base by selecting suppliers from different regions. We find that the buyer's decision to diversify depends on her bid-taker power-that is, her ability to choose the auction mechanism. At one extreme, when the buyer has full bid-taker power and thus can dictatorially implement the optimal mechanism, she always prefers to diversify. At the other extreme, when the buyer uses a reverse English auction with no reserve price due to her lack of bid-taker power, she generally prefers to protect herself against potential price escalation from cost-advantaged suppliers by diversifying less. The managerial insight is that the more bid-taker power the buyer has to control price escalation from cost-advantaged suppliers the more she prefers a diversified supply base. This insight is shown to be robust to correlation between regional costs, ex ante asymmetry between regions, and intermediate levels of bid-taker power. © 2014 INFORMS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofManufacturing and Service Operations Management-
dc.subjectProcurement auctions-
dc.subjectSupply base design-
dc.subjectBid-taker power-
dc.titleBid-taker power and supply base diversification-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1287/msom.2014.0477-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84901746289-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage300-
dc.identifier.epage314-
dc.identifier.eissn1526-5498-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000343747500011-
dc.identifier.issnl1523-4614-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats