File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Stem cell science and its public: The case of Singapore

TitleStem cell science and its public: The case of Singapore
Authors
KeywordsSingapore
Stem cell
Participation
Embryo
Egg
Public
Issue Date2010
Citation
East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 2010, v. 4, n. 1, p. 7-29 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this paper, we attempt to elucidate a "public" that has emerged in response to the work of the Bioethics Advisory Committee (BAC)-an expert body appointed by the Singapore Government-that culminated in the publication of two reports relating to stem cell science and technology. We follow Annelise Riles in explicating a recursive form from which both the "public" and stem cell science and technology draw reference in their co-production. In this regard, we borrow Sheila Jasanoff's terminology of "civic epistemology" in explicating this form, with focus on the practices institutionalised in the BAC and the ways in which knowledge claims are presented, tested and put to use in the public domain. We further attempt to provide an analysis of particular ethical constructs (such as "embryo" and "egg") that have emerged. In so doing, we illustrate the development and refinement of a "civic epistemology" since 2001 whilst setting out the current ethical landscape in Singapore. © 2010 National Science Council, Taiwan.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280141
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.313
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, W. Calvin-
dc.contributor.authorCapps, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorVoo, Teck Chuan-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-06T02:07:30Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-06T02:07:30Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationEast Asian Science, Technology and Society, 2010, v. 4, n. 1, p. 7-29-
dc.identifier.issn1875-2160-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280141-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we attempt to elucidate a "public" that has emerged in response to the work of the Bioethics Advisory Committee (BAC)-an expert body appointed by the Singapore Government-that culminated in the publication of two reports relating to stem cell science and technology. We follow Annelise Riles in explicating a recursive form from which both the "public" and stem cell science and technology draw reference in their co-production. In this regard, we borrow Sheila Jasanoff's terminology of "civic epistemology" in explicating this form, with focus on the practices institutionalised in the BAC and the ways in which knowledge claims are presented, tested and put to use in the public domain. We further attempt to provide an analysis of particular ethical constructs (such as "embryo" and "egg") that have emerged. In so doing, we illustrate the development and refinement of a "civic epistemology" since 2001 whilst setting out the current ethical landscape in Singapore. © 2010 National Science Council, Taiwan.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEast Asian Science, Technology and Society-
dc.subjectSingapore-
dc.subjectStem cell-
dc.subjectParticipation-
dc.subjectEmbryo-
dc.subjectEgg-
dc.subjectPublic-
dc.titleStem cell science and its public: The case of Singapore-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12280-010-9117-2-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77954537197-
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage7-
dc.identifier.epage29-
dc.identifier.eissn1875-2152-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000214978400002-
dc.identifier.issnl1875-2152-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats