File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening

TitleRFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening
Authors
KeywordsBidding/auctions
Mechanism design
Procurement
Supplier qualification
Supplier screening
Issue Date2009
Citation
Operations Research, 2009, v. 57, n. 4, p. 934-949 How to Cite?
AbstractWe consider a manufacturer using a request-for-quotes(RFQ) reverse auction in combination with supplier qualification screening to determine which qualified supplier will be awarded a contract. Supplier qualification screening is costly for the manufacturer - for example, involving reference checks, financial audits, and on-site visits. The manufacturer seeks to minimize its total procurement costs, i.e., the contract payment plus qualification costs. Although suppliers can be qualified prior to the auction(prequalification), we allow the manufacturer to delay all or part of the qualification until after the auction(postqualification). Using an optimal mechanism analysis, we analytically explore the trade-offs between varying levels of pre- and postqualification. Although using postqualification causes the expected contract payment to increase(bids from unqualified suppliers are discarded), we find that standard industrial practices of prequalification can be improved upon by judicious use of postqualification, particularly when supplier qualification screening is moderately expensive relative to the value of the contract to the manufacturer. © 2009 INFORMS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280139
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.848
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, Zhixi-
dc.contributor.authorBeil, Damian R.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-06T02:07:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-06T02:07:29Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationOperations Research, 2009, v. 57, n. 4, p. 934-949-
dc.identifier.issn0030-364X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280139-
dc.description.abstractWe consider a manufacturer using a request-for-quotes(RFQ) reverse auction in combination with supplier qualification screening to determine which qualified supplier will be awarded a contract. Supplier qualification screening is costly for the manufacturer - for example, involving reference checks, financial audits, and on-site visits. The manufacturer seeks to minimize its total procurement costs, i.e., the contract payment plus qualification costs. Although suppliers can be qualified prior to the auction(prequalification), we allow the manufacturer to delay all or part of the qualification until after the auction(postqualification). Using an optimal mechanism analysis, we analytically explore the trade-offs between varying levels of pre- and postqualification. Although using postqualification causes the expected contract payment to increase(bids from unqualified suppliers are discarded), we find that standard industrial practices of prequalification can be improved upon by judicious use of postqualification, particularly when supplier qualification screening is moderately expensive relative to the value of the contract to the manufacturer. © 2009 INFORMS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofOperations Research-
dc.subjectBidding/auctions-
dc.subjectMechanism design-
dc.subjectProcurement-
dc.subjectSupplier qualification-
dc.subjectSupplier screening-
dc.titleRFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1287/opre.1080.0657-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-67649987507-
dc.identifier.volume57-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage934-
dc.identifier.epage949-
dc.identifier.eissn1526-5463-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000270032800011-
dc.identifier.issnl0030-364X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats