File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207687
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85057594405
- PMID: 30513094
- WOS: WOS:000452204800014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Hong Kong’s role in global health: Public opinion of official development assistance
Title | Hong Kong’s role in global health: Public opinion of official development assistance |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | adult age budget disaster education |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.plosone.org/home.action |
Citation | PLoS One, 2018, v. 13 n. 12, p. article no. e0207687 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Governments in high income countries allocate funding for Official Development Assistance (ODA), and population-based surveys tend to show support for the concept of affluent nations assisting the development of poorer regions. A public opinion survey was conducted in Hong Kong to: (1) assess public support for foreign aid for social development and Hong Kong's current Disaster Relief Fund (DRF); and (2) assess how much respondents thought should be contributed to foreign aid for social development and/or DRF. Interviewers conducted a random telephone survey of Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong citizens aged 18 or above during 2017. Of the 1004 individuals surveyed, 55% (552) agreed that a portion of the government budget should be allocated to the DRF and 37% (372) disagreed. The mean and the median amount of the government budget suggested to be allocated were 5.1% and 2.4% respectively. However only 16% (164) supported the government giving foreign aid for social development, with 79% (793) not supporting, and 5% (47) undecided. The suggested portions of government budget that should be allocated for this purpose were 1.5% (mean) and 0.0% (median). The degree of support for DRF and foreign aid for social development was associated with both age (DRF P < 0.0005; foreign aid for social development P < 0.0005) and education (DRF P = 0.010; foreign aid for social development: P < 0.0005). There was little support for foreign aid for social development amongst the Hong Kong public, in contrast to similar surveys in other countries, but this could be related to the lack of a local tradition of providing ODA to foreign countries. Most respondents supported the current DRF and would like to see a greater proportion of government budget allocated. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280109 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.839 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, CH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Goggins, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baum, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nelson, EAS | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-06T02:01:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-06T02:01:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS One, 2018, v. 13 n. 12, p. article no. e0207687 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280109 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Governments in high income countries allocate funding for Official Development Assistance (ODA), and population-based surveys tend to show support for the concept of affluent nations assisting the development of poorer regions. A public opinion survey was conducted in Hong Kong to: (1) assess public support for foreign aid for social development and Hong Kong's current Disaster Relief Fund (DRF); and (2) assess how much respondents thought should be contributed to foreign aid for social development and/or DRF. Interviewers conducted a random telephone survey of Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong citizens aged 18 or above during 2017. Of the 1004 individuals surveyed, 55% (552) agreed that a portion of the government budget should be allocated to the DRF and 37% (372) disagreed. The mean and the median amount of the government budget suggested to be allocated were 5.1% and 2.4% respectively. However only 16% (164) supported the government giving foreign aid for social development, with 79% (793) not supporting, and 5% (47) undecided. The suggested portions of government budget that should be allocated for this purpose were 1.5% (mean) and 0.0% (median). The degree of support for DRF and foreign aid for social development was associated with both age (DRF P < 0.0005; foreign aid for social development P < 0.0005) and education (DRF P = 0.010; foreign aid for social development: P < 0.0005). There was little support for foreign aid for social development amongst the Hong Kong public, in contrast to similar surveys in other countries, but this could be related to the lack of a local tradition of providing ODA to foreign countries. Most respondents supported the current DRF and would like to see a greater proportion of government budget allocated. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.plosone.org/home.action | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS ONE | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | adult | - |
dc.subject | age | - |
dc.subject | budget | - |
dc.subject | disaster | - |
dc.subject | education | - |
dc.title | Hong Kong’s role in global health: Public opinion of official development assistance | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Baum, L: lwbaum@hku.hk | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0207687 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30513094 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC6279225 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85057594405 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 308869 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. e0207687 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. e0207687 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000452204800014 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1932-6203 | - |