File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116111
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85071400172
- PMID: 31446124
- WOS: WOS:000491861000047
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Human brain responses to gustatory and food stimuli: A meta-evaluation of neuroimaging meta-analyses
Title | Human brain responses to gustatory and food stimuli: A meta-evaluation of neuroimaging meta-analyses |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Meta-evaluation Meta-analysis Gustation Food Taste |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Academic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg |
Citation | NeuroImage, 2019, v. 202, p. article no. 116111 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Multiple neuroimaging meta-analyses have been published concerning gustation, food and taste. A meta-evaluation of these meta-analyses was conducted to qualitatively evaluate the presented evidence. A systematic search was done using multiple databases, in which no restriction was placed on participants and nature of interventions (stimuli vs control). Twenty-three meta-analyses were identified and analyzed. All of them have met 4–9 criteria, out of 11, from the modified checklist constructed by Müller et al. (2018), which implied moderate to high quality of evidence. One of the concerns we found was that no meta-analysis surveyed had been explicitly pre-registered. Also, only three meta-analyses (13.0%) provided clear explanation of how they accounted for sample overlap. Only six meta-analyses (26.1%) explicitly described how they double checked the data. Only two of the 20 meta-analyses (10.0%) using GingerALE software used both the debugged version (v2.3.6) as well as the recommended cluster-level inference with familywise error rate correction. Overall, meta-analyses are increasingly adopting more stringent statistical thresholds, but unfortunately not larger number of studies contained in the analyses. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/279958 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.436 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, AWK | - |
dc.contributor.author | WONG, NSM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Eickhoff, SB | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-23T08:24:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-23T08:24:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | NeuroImage, 2019, v. 202, p. article no. 116111 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1053-8119 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/279958 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Multiple neuroimaging meta-analyses have been published concerning gustation, food and taste. A meta-evaluation of these meta-analyses was conducted to qualitatively evaluate the presented evidence. A systematic search was done using multiple databases, in which no restriction was placed on participants and nature of interventions (stimuli vs control). Twenty-three meta-analyses were identified and analyzed. All of them have met 4–9 criteria, out of 11, from the modified checklist constructed by Müller et al. (2018), which implied moderate to high quality of evidence. One of the concerns we found was that no meta-analysis surveyed had been explicitly pre-registered. Also, only three meta-analyses (13.0%) provided clear explanation of how they accounted for sample overlap. Only six meta-analyses (26.1%) explicitly described how they double checked the data. Only two of the 20 meta-analyses (10.0%) using GingerALE software used both the debugged version (v2.3.6) as well as the recommended cluster-level inference with familywise error rate correction. Overall, meta-analyses are increasingly adopting more stringent statistical thresholds, but unfortunately not larger number of studies contained in the analyses. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Academic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | NeuroImage | - |
dc.subject | Meta-evaluation | - |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | Gustation | - |
dc.subject | Food | - |
dc.subject | Taste | - |
dc.title | Human brain responses to gustatory and food stimuli: A meta-evaluation of neuroimaging meta-analyses | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Yeung, AWK: ndyeung@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lau, H: oldchild@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Yeung, AWK=rp02143 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lau, H=rp02270 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116111 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31446124 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85071400172 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 308744 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 202 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 116111 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 116111 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000491861000047 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1053-8119 | - |