File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces

TitleEvaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces
Authors
KeywordsActinomyces
calcium phosphates
caseins
dental amalgam
glass ionomer cements
Issue Date2019
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2019, v. 64 n. 4, p. 365-375 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Restorative materials have varying surface characteristics from natural tooth, which may affect oral‐bacterial surface attachment/growth. This study examined 48‐h Streptococcus mutans (Sm) or Actinomyces naeslundii (An) growth on various restorative materials and tooth surfaces. Methods: The quantity and viability of 48‐hour‐old Sm and An growth on polished (180‐ or 1200‐grits), saliva‐coated resin composite (RC), glass ionomer cements (GIC), resin‐modified GIC (R‐GIC), GIC containing casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (3% (w/w), CPP‐ACP GIC), amalgam or tooth blocks (5 × 5 × 1 mm3) were examined. Results: Rough‐polished (arithmetical mean deviation of the assessed surface roughness profile (Ra): 1.50–1.75 µm) material surfaces revealed relatively higher proportion of inorganic, positively charged surface components ((Si + Al)/C) and greater quantity of surface attached bacteria than smooth polished (Ra: 0.20–0.35 µm) material groups (P < 0.001). Less Sm and An were observed on tooth, and smooth polished GIC and CPP‐ACP GIC surfaces than on resin‐based materials (RC, R‐GIC) and amalgam (P ≤ 0.003). Viability of Sm was found to be lower on amalgam surfaces (P < 0.001), whereas that of An appeared lower on both amalgam surfaces and rough CPP‐ACP GIC surfaces (P ≤ 0.033). Conclusion: Surface roughness exerted a pronounced effect on in vitro growth/attached Sm/An quantity but may not have an impact on bacteria viability. Interestingly, despite smoother surfaces of various materials tested, fewer Sm/An were observed attaching on tooth surfaces.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278110
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.597
ISI Accession Number ID
Grants

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWei, CX-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, WK-
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MF-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T08:07:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-04T08:07:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2019, v. 64 n. 4, p. 365-375-
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278110-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Restorative materials have varying surface characteristics from natural tooth, which may affect oral‐bacterial surface attachment/growth. This study examined 48‐h Streptococcus mutans (Sm) or Actinomyces naeslundii (An) growth on various restorative materials and tooth surfaces. Methods: The quantity and viability of 48‐hour‐old Sm and An growth on polished (180‐ or 1200‐grits), saliva‐coated resin composite (RC), glass ionomer cements (GIC), resin‐modified GIC (R‐GIC), GIC containing casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (3% (w/w), CPP‐ACP GIC), amalgam or tooth blocks (5 × 5 × 1 mm3) were examined. Results: Rough‐polished (arithmetical mean deviation of the assessed surface roughness profile (Ra): 1.50–1.75 µm) material surfaces revealed relatively higher proportion of inorganic, positively charged surface components ((Si + Al)/C) and greater quantity of surface attached bacteria than smooth polished (Ra: 0.20–0.35 µm) material groups (P < 0.001). Less Sm and An were observed on tooth, and smooth polished GIC and CPP‐ACP GIC surfaces than on resin‐based materials (RC, R‐GIC) and amalgam (P ≤ 0.003). Viability of Sm was found to be lower on amalgam surfaces (P < 0.001), whereas that of An appeared lower on both amalgam surfaces and rough CPP‐ACP GIC surfaces (P ≤ 0.033). Conclusion: Surface roughness exerted a pronounced effect on in vitro growth/attached Sm/An quantity but may not have an impact on bacteria viability. Interestingly, despite smoother surfaces of various materials tested, fewer Sm/An were observed attaching on tooth surfaces.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421-
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journal-
dc.rightsPreprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Postprint This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectActinomyces-
dc.subjectcalcium phosphates-
dc.subjectcaseins-
dc.subjectdental amalgam-
dc.subjectglass ionomer cements-
dc.titleEvaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, WK: ewkleung@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF: mfburr58@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, WK=rp00019-
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/adj.12715-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85074034662-
dc.identifier.hkuros306971-
dc.identifier.volume64-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage365-
dc.identifier.epage375-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000506681000009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.relation.projectDental and restorative materials acquired pellicle proteomics and microbiomics: A key battle front to defense against recurrent oral disease.-
dc.identifier.issnl0045-0421-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats