File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Prediction of hospital mortality in ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma

TitlePrediction of hospital mortality in ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-1633
Citation
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and The College of Surgeons of Hong Kong (RCSEd/CSHK) Conjoint Scientific Congress 2019: Advances Innovation in Surgery, Hong Kong, 21-22 September 2019. In Surgical Practice, 2019, v. 23 n. S1, p. 26 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: Prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was poor. There is no prognostic score to guide treatment strategy in these patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all ruptured HCC patients in a university center from 2003 to 2016 was performed. A predictive score for hospital mortality was calculated using clinical and tumor parameters. Significant predictors for hospital mortality was analyzed using Cox regression and predictive performance of the score was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The scoring system was subsequently validated in a prospective observational study from 2017 to 2018. Results: The training set was based on 315 ruptured HCC patients with an overall hospital mortality of 43.5%. Transarterial embolization was the mainstay of treatment (46%) and 16.2% received surgical treatment. On multivariate analysis, MELD>14 [HR7.322 (4.128–12.988), P < 0.001], bilobar HCC [HR2.555 (1.383–4.719), P = 0.003], known history of HCC [HR3.129 (1.771–5.529), P < 0.001] and complication of variceal bleeding [HR53.414 (5.919–481.999), P < 0.001] were significant predictors for hospital mortality. The ROC curve of training set had an area under curve of 0.834, P < 0.001. In the prospective validation set, 41 patients were included and overall hospital mortality was similar (46.3%). The median MELD was 13.33(6–29), median size of HCC was 11.5(2–23) and most had multifocal disease. In the ROC curve of validated cohort, area under curve was 0.744(0.59–0.898), P = 0.008. When the score was >5, patients had 100% hospital mortality. Conclusion: We have developed a reliable scoring system to predict hospital mortality after HCC rupture and treatment could be futile if the score was >5.
DescriptionPoster Presentation - no. P26
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277558
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 0.172
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.109

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCui, TYS-
dc.contributor.authorWong, CLT-
dc.contributor.authorNg, KCK-
dc.contributor.authorDai, WC-
dc.contributor.authorChok, KSH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, ACY-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorLo, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T08:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-20T08:53:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and The College of Surgeons of Hong Kong (RCSEd/CSHK) Conjoint Scientific Congress 2019: Advances Innovation in Surgery, Hong Kong, 21-22 September 2019. In Surgical Practice, 2019, v. 23 n. S1, p. 26-
dc.identifier.issn1744-1625-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277558-
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation - no. P26-
dc.description.abstractAim: Prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was poor. There is no prognostic score to guide treatment strategy in these patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all ruptured HCC patients in a university center from 2003 to 2016 was performed. A predictive score for hospital mortality was calculated using clinical and tumor parameters. Significant predictors for hospital mortality was analyzed using Cox regression and predictive performance of the score was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The scoring system was subsequently validated in a prospective observational study from 2017 to 2018. Results: The training set was based on 315 ruptured HCC patients with an overall hospital mortality of 43.5%. Transarterial embolization was the mainstay of treatment (46%) and 16.2% received surgical treatment. On multivariate analysis, MELD>14 [HR7.322 (4.128–12.988), P < 0.001], bilobar HCC [HR2.555 (1.383–4.719), P = 0.003], known history of HCC [HR3.129 (1.771–5.529), P < 0.001] and complication of variceal bleeding [HR53.414 (5.919–481.999), P < 0.001] were significant predictors for hospital mortality. The ROC curve of training set had an area under curve of 0.834, P < 0.001. In the prospective validation set, 41 patients were included and overall hospital mortality was similar (46.3%). The median MELD was 13.33(6–29), median size of HCC was 11.5(2–23) and most had multifocal disease. In the ROC curve of validated cohort, area under curve was 0.744(0.59–0.898), P = 0.008. When the score was >5, patients had 100% hospital mortality. Conclusion: We have developed a reliable scoring system to predict hospital mortality after HCC rupture and treatment could be futile if the score was >5.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1744-1633-
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Practice-
dc.relation.ispartofRCSEd/CSHK Conjoint Scientific Congress 2019-
dc.titlePrediction of hospital mortality in ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailWong, CLT: wongtcl@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, KCK: kkcng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailDai, WC: daiwc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChok, KSH: chok6275@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, ACY: acchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, TT: cheung68@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, CLT=rp01679-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, KCK=rp02390-
dc.identifier.authorityChok, KSH=rp02110-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, ACY=rp00310-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, TT=rp02129-
dc.identifier.authorityLo, CM=rp00412-
dc.identifier.hkuros305376-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issueS1-
dc.identifier.spage26-
dc.identifier.epage26-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-
dc.identifier.issnl1744-1625-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats