File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design

TitleEfficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
Authors
KeywordsMemory Specificity Training
Autobiographical memory
Multiple baseline design
Depression
Issue Date2019
PublisherElsevier: Creative Commons. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/internet-interventions/
Citation
Internet Interventions, 2019, v. 18, article no. 100259 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground and objectives: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component (memory specificity trials) is offered online and individually (c-MeST). Methods: A multiple-baseline across-participants design with a randomization-to-baseline length (14 to 33 days) was used. Participants were twenty adults (16 female; Mage = 50, SD = 12) experiencing reduced AMS, at least one lifetime depressive episode and who currently reported at least minimal depressive symptoms. During baseline, the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days) and a three-month follow-up assessment, AMS, depressive symptoms and related processes were measured. Results: AMS improved significantly by three months follow-up. Session-to-session scores indicated that AMS improved most from baseline to the first online session, with no further improvement thereafter. In contrast to studies with clinical participants, no significant change in symptoms or secondary processes such as rumination was found. Conclusions: Translating MeST into an online, individual version is a feasible, low-cost intervention for reduced AMS. Future research should examine c-MeST's potential for preventing increases in symptoms in at-risk samples with longer follow-ups as well as its potential for reducing symptoms in clinical groups.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/276265
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.358
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.097
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartens, K-
dc.contributor.authorBarry, TJ-
dc.contributor.authorTakano, K-
dc.contributor.authorOnghena, P-
dc.contributor.authorRaes, F-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T02:59:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-10T02:59:24Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationInternet Interventions, 2019, v. 18, article no. 100259-
dc.identifier.issn2214-7829-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/276265-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component (memory specificity trials) is offered online and individually (c-MeST). Methods: A multiple-baseline across-participants design with a randomization-to-baseline length (14 to 33 days) was used. Participants were twenty adults (16 female; Mage = 50, SD = 12) experiencing reduced AMS, at least one lifetime depressive episode and who currently reported at least minimal depressive symptoms. During baseline, the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days) and a three-month follow-up assessment, AMS, depressive symptoms and related processes were measured. Results: AMS improved significantly by three months follow-up. Session-to-session scores indicated that AMS improved most from baseline to the first online session, with no further improvement thereafter. In contrast to studies with clinical participants, no significant change in symptoms or secondary processes such as rumination was found. Conclusions: Translating MeST into an online, individual version is a feasible, low-cost intervention for reduced AMS. Future research should examine c-MeST's potential for preventing increases in symptoms in at-risk samples with longer follow-ups as well as its potential for reducing symptoms in clinical groups.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier: Creative Commons. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/internet-interventions/-
dc.relation.ispartofInternet Interventions-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectMemory Specificity Training-
dc.subjectAutobiographical memory-
dc.subjectMultiple baseline design-
dc.subjectDepression-
dc.titleEfficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBarry, TJ: tjbarry@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBarry, TJ=rp02277-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259-
dc.identifier.pmid31890612-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6926331-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85069661272-
dc.identifier.hkuros303177-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 100259-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 100259-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000500917500006-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-
dc.identifier.issnl2214-7829-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats