File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Naturalness and frequency in implicit phonological learning

TitleNaturalness and frequency in implicit phonological learning
Authors
Issue Date2016
PublisherLinguistic Society of America.
Citation
The 90th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), Washington, D.C, USA, 7-10 January 2016 How to Cite?
AbstractHow do naturalness and frequency interact in phonological learning? We tested the effect of frequency of exposure on the ability of adults to implicitly learn phonetically natural post-nasal voicing and phonetically unnatural post-nasal devoicing. Participants learned one of ten artificial languages: five showing voicing, and five showing devoicing. For voicing languages, learners generalized the alternation to novel stems more often with increased exposure. For devoicing languages, increased exposure did not increase the probability of generalization except at the highest level of exposure, supporting a bias for natural alternations and a frequency effect, but with a high threshold for unnatural alternations.
DescriptionSession 1: Phonology: Learning and Learnability
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275694

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDo, Y-
dc.contributor.authorHavenhill, J-
dc.contributor.authorZsiga, E-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T02:47:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-10T02:47:46Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe 90th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), Washington, D.C, USA, 7-10 January 2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275694-
dc.descriptionSession 1: Phonology: Learning and Learnability-
dc.description.abstractHow do naturalness and frequency interact in phonological learning? We tested the effect of frequency of exposure on the ability of adults to implicitly learn phonetically natural post-nasal voicing and phonetically unnatural post-nasal devoicing. Participants learned one of ten artificial languages: five showing voicing, and five showing devoicing. For voicing languages, learners generalized the alternation to novel stems more often with increased exposure. For devoicing languages, increased exposure did not increase the probability of generalization except at the highest level of exposure, supporting a bias for natural alternations and a frequency effect, but with a high threshold for unnatural alternations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLinguistic Society of America. -
dc.relation.ispartofThe 90th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA)-
dc.titleNaturalness and frequency in implicit phonological learning-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailDo, Y: youngah@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityDo, Y=rp02160-
dc.identifier.hkuros304890-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats