File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book Chapter: Dialogue with religious life in Asia

TitleDialogue with religious life in Asia
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherRoutledge
Citation
Dialogue with religious life in Asia. In Beaumont, J (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity, p. 258-268. London: Routledge, 2018 How to Cite?
AbstractOver the past decade or so, debates on the advent of a postsecular present have moved center-stage in social and cultural theory. These exchanges have made commendable achievements in analyzing the increasing relevance of religion to public politics and policies. Theorization of the postsecular makes for a hefty intellectual agenda, and a comprehensive review of this agenda is clearly beyond the scope of a single contribution, addressed, more appropriately, in a collective way by this Handbook. Nevertheless, we would like to contribute a few ideas to help delineate the broader permutations of the postsecular turn in social sciences, which serve as the intellectual context for our arguments in this piece.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275593
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKong, L-
dc.contributor.authorQian, J-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T02:45:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-10T02:45:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationDialogue with religious life in Asia. In Beaumont, J (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity, p. 258-268. London: Routledge, 2018-
dc.identifier.isbn9781138234147-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275593-
dc.description.abstractOver the past decade or so, debates on the advent of a postsecular present have moved center-stage in social and cultural theory. These exchanges have made commendable achievements in analyzing the increasing relevance of religion to public politics and policies. Theorization of the postsecular makes for a hefty intellectual agenda, and a comprehensive review of this agenda is clearly beyond the scope of a single contribution, addressed, more appropriately, in a collective way by this Handbook. Nevertheless, we would like to contribute a few ideas to help delineate the broader permutations of the postsecular turn in social sciences, which serve as the intellectual context for our arguments in this piece.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Routledge Handbook of Postsecularity-
dc.titleDialogue with religious life in Asia-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailQian, J: jxqian@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityQian, J=rp02246-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros302817-
dc.identifier.spage258-
dc.identifier.epage268-
dc.publisher.placeLondon-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats