File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Neo-Socialist Governmentality: Managing Freedom in the People's Republic of China

TitleNeo-Socialist Governmentality: Managing Freedom in the People's Republic of China
Authors
KeywordsChina
post-socialism
neo-socialism
neo-liberalism
governmentality
Issue Date2019
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/routledge/03085147.asp
Citation
Economy and Society, 2019, v. 48 n. 4, p. 554-578 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper conceptualizes ‘neo-socialist governmentality’ as a set of rationalities of governance that aim to shape, nurture, constrain and guide the autonomy of Chinese subjects in the post-revolutionary era. Contrasting neo-liberal and neo-socialist governmentalities, we outline the mechanisms of translation and coordination that open, appropriate and restrain spaces for the pluralistic problematization of concerns for the self, culture and society. Focusing on the discourses and institutions of ‘constructing spiritual civilization’ and drawing on research conducted among a range of voluntary groups, we highlight the productive tensions inherent to the neo-socialist aim of fusing the centrifugal forces of socialist, market and Chinese civilizational subjectivities and authorities. Our case points to the value of theorizing distinct forms of governmentality associated with different historical trajectories and socio-political systems.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275491
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.634
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, DA-
dc.contributor.authorWINIGER, F-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T02:43:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-10T02:43:36Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationEconomy and Society, 2019, v. 48 n. 4, p. 554-578-
dc.identifier.issn0308-5147-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/275491-
dc.description.abstractThis paper conceptualizes ‘neo-socialist governmentality’ as a set of rationalities of governance that aim to shape, nurture, constrain and guide the autonomy of Chinese subjects in the post-revolutionary era. Contrasting neo-liberal and neo-socialist governmentalities, we outline the mechanisms of translation and coordination that open, appropriate and restrain spaces for the pluralistic problematization of concerns for the self, culture and society. Focusing on the discourses and institutions of ‘constructing spiritual civilization’ and drawing on research conducted among a range of voluntary groups, we highlight the productive tensions inherent to the neo-socialist aim of fusing the centrifugal forces of socialist, market and Chinese civilizational subjectivities and authorities. Our case points to the value of theorizing distinct forms of governmentality associated with different historical trajectories and socio-political systems.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/routledge/03085147.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofEconomy and Society-
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [Economy and Society] on [2019-11-29], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03085147.2019.1672424-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectpost-socialism-
dc.subjectneo-socialism-
dc.subjectneo-liberalism-
dc.subjectgovernmentality-
dc.titleNeo-Socialist Governmentality: Managing Freedom in the People's Republic of China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailPalmer, DA: palmer19@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityPalmer, DA=rp00654-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03085147.2019.1672424-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85076468386-
dc.identifier.hkuros302450-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage554-
dc.identifier.epage578-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000499315100001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0308-5147-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats