File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: 荀子思想中的化性起偽與道德動機——兼覆林宏星教授

Title荀子思想中的化性起偽與道德動機——兼覆林宏星教授
Moral Motivation and the Transformation of Nature and the Rise of Artifice in Xunzi’s Thought
Authors
Issue Date2018
Publisher輔仁大學文學院. The Journal's web site is located at http://140.136.117.95/wordpress/
Citation
哲學與文化月刊 , 2018, v. 533, p. 113-128 How to Cite?
Universitas: Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture, 2018, v. 533, p. 113-128 How to Cite?
AbstractXunzi’s thought has long been criticized for failing to address two interrelated problems. First, Xunzi seems to be unable to explain the origin of moral norms, for if people’s nature is bad, how can they recognize and give rise to moral norms? Second, Xunzi seems to be unable to explain the question of moral motivation, for how can people of a bad nature be motivated to act morally for morality’s sake? Xunzi scholars tend to agree that moral norms are not constructed overnight, but are rather the results of generations of cultural contrivances. However they tend to disagree over the question of moral motivation. This paper attempts to answer the question of moral motivation through a further articulation of the relationship between nature and artifice. This paper suggests that moral motivation is derived from participation in moral activities and moral practice, while the latter are constructed through an accumulative process of thought and deliberation, activities and customs. Such an accumulative process, in its turn, represents a self-interpretation of human beings and the good life by a cultural tradition.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/274320
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTang, SF-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-18T14:59:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-18T14:59:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citation哲學與文化月刊 , 2018, v. 533, p. 113-128-
dc.identifier.citationUniversitas: Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture, 2018, v. 533, p. 113-128-
dc.identifier.issn1015-8383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/274320-
dc.description.abstractXunzi’s thought has long been criticized for failing to address two interrelated problems. First, Xunzi seems to be unable to explain the origin of moral norms, for if people’s nature is bad, how can they recognize and give rise to moral norms? Second, Xunzi seems to be unable to explain the question of moral motivation, for how can people of a bad nature be motivated to act morally for morality’s sake? Xunzi scholars tend to agree that moral norms are not constructed overnight, but are rather the results of generations of cultural contrivances. However they tend to disagree over the question of moral motivation. This paper attempts to answer the question of moral motivation through a further articulation of the relationship between nature and artifice. This paper suggests that moral motivation is derived from participation in moral activities and moral practice, while the latter are constructed through an accumulative process of thought and deliberation, activities and customs. Such an accumulative process, in its turn, represents a self-interpretation of human beings and the good life by a cultural tradition.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisher輔仁大學文學院. The Journal's web site is located at http://140.136.117.95/wordpress/-
dc.relation.ispartof哲學與文化月刊 -
dc.relation.ispartofUniversitas: Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture-
dc.title荀子思想中的化性起偽與道德動機——兼覆林宏星教授-
dc.titleMoral Motivation and the Transformation of Nature and the Rise of Artifice in Xunzi’s Thought-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTang, SF: tangsf@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTang, SF=rp01153-
dc.identifier.hkuros301469-
dc.identifier.volume533-
dc.identifier.spage113-
dc.identifier.epage128-
dc.publisher.placeTaiwan-
dc.identifier.issnl1015-8383-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats