File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Statistical modeling of rates and trends in Holocene relative sea level

TitleStatistical modeling of rates and trends in Holocene relative sea level
Authors
KeywordsSea level
RSL
Hierarchical statistical modeling
Issue Date2019
Citation
Quaternary Science Reviews, 2019, v. 204, p. 58-77 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2018 Elsevier Ltd Characterizing the spatio-temporal variability of relative sea level (RSL) and estimating local, regional, and global RSL trends requires statistical analysis of RSL data. Formal statistical treatments, needed to account for the spatially and temporally sparse distribution of data and for geochronological and elevational uncertainties, have advanced considerably over the last decade. Time-series models have adopted more flexible and physically-informed specifications with more rigorous quantification of uncertainties. Spatio-temporal models have evolved from simple regional averaging to frameworks that more richly represent the correlation structure of RSL across space and time. More complex statistical approaches enable rigorous quantification of spatial and temporal variability, the combination of geographically disparate data, and the separation of the RSL field into various components associated with different driving processes. We review the range of statistical modeling and analysis choices used in the literature, reformulating them for ease of comparison in a common hierarchical statistical framework. The hierarchical framework separates each model into different levels, clearly partitioning measurement and inferential uncertainty from process variability. Placing models in a hierarchical framework enables us to highlight both the similarities and differences among modeling and analysis choices. We illustrate the implications of some modeling and analysis choices currently used in the literature by comparing the results of their application to common datasets within a hierarchical framework. In light of the complex patterns of spatial and temporal variability exhibited by RSL, we recommend non-parametric approaches for modeling temporal and spatio-temporal RSL.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273648
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.558
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAshe, Erica L.-
dc.contributor.authorCahill, Niamh-
dc.contributor.authorHay, Carling-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Nicole S.-
dc.contributor.authorKemp, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorEngelhart, Simon E.-
dc.contributor.authorHorton, Benjamin P.-
dc.contributor.authorParnell, Andrew C.-
dc.contributor.authorKopp, Robert E.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T09:56:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T09:56:15Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationQuaternary Science Reviews, 2019, v. 204, p. 58-77-
dc.identifier.issn0277-3791-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273648-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier Ltd Characterizing the spatio-temporal variability of relative sea level (RSL) and estimating local, regional, and global RSL trends requires statistical analysis of RSL data. Formal statistical treatments, needed to account for the spatially and temporally sparse distribution of data and for geochronological and elevational uncertainties, have advanced considerably over the last decade. Time-series models have adopted more flexible and physically-informed specifications with more rigorous quantification of uncertainties. Spatio-temporal models have evolved from simple regional averaging to frameworks that more richly represent the correlation structure of RSL across space and time. More complex statistical approaches enable rigorous quantification of spatial and temporal variability, the combination of geographically disparate data, and the separation of the RSL field into various components associated with different driving processes. We review the range of statistical modeling and analysis choices used in the literature, reformulating them for ease of comparison in a common hierarchical statistical framework. The hierarchical framework separates each model into different levels, clearly partitioning measurement and inferential uncertainty from process variability. Placing models in a hierarchical framework enables us to highlight both the similarities and differences among modeling and analysis choices. We illustrate the implications of some modeling and analysis choices currently used in the literature by comparing the results of their application to common datasets within a hierarchical framework. In light of the complex patterns of spatial and temporal variability exhibited by RSL, we recommend non-parametric approaches for modeling temporal and spatio-temporal RSL.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofQuaternary Science Reviews-
dc.subjectSea level-
dc.subjectRSL-
dc.subjectHierarchical statistical modeling-
dc.titleStatistical modeling of rates and trends in Holocene relative sea level-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.10.032-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85057841108-
dc.identifier.volume204-
dc.identifier.spage58-
dc.identifier.epage77-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000456353300004-
dc.identifier.issnl0277-3791-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats