File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Depositional mechanisms and morphology of debris flow: physical modelling

TitleDepositional mechanisms and morphology of debris flow: physical modelling
Authors
KeywordsFlow regimes
Grain size segregation
Debris flow
Deposit morphology
Flume model tests
Issue Date2019
Citation
Landslides, 2019, v. 16, n. 2, p. 315-332 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. A comprehensive understanding of the deposition mechanisms and morphology of debris flows is necessary to delineate the extent of a debris flow hazard. However, due to the wide range of debris flow compositions and the complex topography in the field, there remains a deficiency of fundamental understanding on how the effects of grain-size distribution, water content, and channel slope influence the deposition mechanisms and morphology of debris flow. In this study, a series of experimental tests were carried out using a flume with a horizontal outflow plane to discern the effects of particle size, water content, and slope on the deposition morphology and grain size segregation on the deposition fan. Results reveal that the experimental debris flows are under either viscous or collisional flow regimes. Most experimental debris flow fronts lack high pore fluid pressures, emphasizing the formation of deposits via grain-grain and grain-bed friction and collisions; also high excess pore fluid pressure (positive) behind the front head is measured and it is beneficial for the mobility of debris flows. Both the deposit area and runout-width ratio are positively correlated to the Bagnold and Savage numbers and the initial water contents. Furthermore, an increase of fines content reduces the runout distance. However, this feature is not as obvious for high water content flows (w = 28.5% in this study). Moreover, smoother transition topography between the transportation and deposition zone leads to longer runout distances. For debris flows with a high solid fraction (C s > 0.52 in this study), particle sorting is quite inhibited in the deposit fan.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273644
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 6.153
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.910
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Gordon G.D.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Shuai-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Dongri-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Clarence E.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiaoqing-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T09:56:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T09:56:15Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationLandslides, 2019, v. 16, n. 2, p. 315-332-
dc.identifier.issn1612-510X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273644-
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. A comprehensive understanding of the deposition mechanisms and morphology of debris flows is necessary to delineate the extent of a debris flow hazard. However, due to the wide range of debris flow compositions and the complex topography in the field, there remains a deficiency of fundamental understanding on how the effects of grain-size distribution, water content, and channel slope influence the deposition mechanisms and morphology of debris flow. In this study, a series of experimental tests were carried out using a flume with a horizontal outflow plane to discern the effects of particle size, water content, and slope on the deposition morphology and grain size segregation on the deposition fan. Results reveal that the experimental debris flows are under either viscous or collisional flow regimes. Most experimental debris flow fronts lack high pore fluid pressures, emphasizing the formation of deposits via grain-grain and grain-bed friction and collisions; also high excess pore fluid pressure (positive) behind the front head is measured and it is beneficial for the mobility of debris flows. Both the deposit area and runout-width ratio are positively correlated to the Bagnold and Savage numbers and the initial water contents. Furthermore, an increase of fines content reduces the runout distance. However, this feature is not as obvious for high water content flows (w = 28.5% in this study). Moreover, smoother transition topography between the transportation and deposition zone leads to longer runout distances. For debris flows with a high solid fraction (C s > 0.52 in this study), particle sorting is quite inhibited in the deposit fan.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLandslides-
dc.subjectFlow regimes-
dc.subjectGrain size segregation-
dc.subjectDebris flow-
dc.subjectDeposit morphology-
dc.subjectFlume model tests-
dc.titleDepositional mechanisms and morphology of debris flow: physical modelling-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10346-018-1095-9-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85056176145-
dc.identifier.hkuros311422-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage315-
dc.identifier.epage332-
dc.identifier.eissn1612-5118-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000460468500009-
dc.identifier.issnl1612-510X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats