File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow

TitleComputational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow
Authors
KeywordsFlume modeling
Interaction mechanisms
Discrete element method
Channelized debris flow
Baffles
Issue Date2014
Citation
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 182-197 How to Cite?
AbstractChannelized debris flows surge downslope in mountainous regions and have large impact forces. Arrays of debris flow baffles are frequently positioned in front of rigid barriers to engage torrents and attenuate flow energy. They are regularly designed on empirical and prescriptive basis because their interaction mechanism is not well understood. Numerical backanalysis of flume experiments using the discrete element method (DEM) is conducted to provide insight on flow interaction with an array of baffles. Varying configurations of baffle height, a second staggered row, and spacing between successive rows are examined. Upstream and downstream kinematics are monitored to capture and compare the Froude number, kinetic energy, and discharge resulting from each baffle configuration. Results from this study reveal that the height of baffles can be categorized relative to the initial approach flow depth (h), namely tall baffles (1.5h) and short baffles (0.75h). Tall baffles are characterized by the development of upstream subcritical flow conditions, whereas short baffles exhibit supercritical upstream conditions. Furthermore, tall baffles facilitate the suppression of overflow, and short baffles lead to excessive overflow that is supercritical in nature. Less flow attenuation occurs as the distance increases both upstream and downstream from each array of baffles. A second staggered row of short staggered baffles is ineffective in reducing debris kinetic energy, whereas tall baffles should be positioned as close as possible.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273554
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.513
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoi, C. E.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, C.-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, R.-
dc.contributor.authorSong, D.-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, J.-
dc.contributor.authorHo, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T09:55:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T09:55:55Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 182-197-
dc.identifier.issn0008-3674-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273554-
dc.description.abstractChannelized debris flows surge downslope in mountainous regions and have large impact forces. Arrays of debris flow baffles are frequently positioned in front of rigid barriers to engage torrents and attenuate flow energy. They are regularly designed on empirical and prescriptive basis because their interaction mechanism is not well understood. Numerical backanalysis of flume experiments using the discrete element method (DEM) is conducted to provide insight on flow interaction with an array of baffles. Varying configurations of baffle height, a second staggered row, and spacing between successive rows are examined. Upstream and downstream kinematics are monitored to capture and compare the Froude number, kinetic energy, and discharge resulting from each baffle configuration. Results from this study reveal that the height of baffles can be categorized relative to the initial approach flow depth (h), namely tall baffles (1.5h) and short baffles (0.75h). Tall baffles are characterized by the development of upstream subcritical flow conditions, whereas short baffles exhibit supercritical upstream conditions. Furthermore, tall baffles facilitate the suppression of overflow, and short baffles lead to excessive overflow that is supercritical in nature. Less flow attenuation occurs as the distance increases both upstream and downstream from each array of baffles. A second staggered row of short staggered baffles is ineffective in reducing debris kinetic energy, whereas tall baffles should be positioned as close as possible.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Geotechnical Journal-
dc.subjectFlume modeling-
dc.subjectInteraction mechanisms-
dc.subjectDiscrete element method-
dc.subjectChannelized debris flow-
dc.subjectBaffles-
dc.titleComputational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/cgj-2013-0157-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84961700348-
dc.identifier.volume52-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage182-
dc.identifier.epage197-
dc.identifier.eissn1208-6010-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000349233400005-
dc.identifier.issnl0008-3674-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats