File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85068565892
- PMID: 31272393
- WOS: WOS:000474558200002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effect of Prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial
Title | Effect of Prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Incentive Follow-up Randomized controlled trial Smoker |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedresmethodol/ |
Citation | BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2019, v. 19, article no. 138, p. 1-8 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background:
Monetary incentive is often used to increase response rate in smokers’ survey, but such effect of prepaid and promised incentives in a follow-up survey is unknown. We compared the effect of different incentive schemes on the consent and retention rates in a follow-up survey of adult cigarette smokers.
Methods:
This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Hong Kong, China. Smokers who completed a non-incentivized baseline telephone smoking survey were invited to a 3-month follow-up, with randomization into (1) the control group (no incentive), (2) a promised HK$100 (US$12.8) incentive upon completion, (3) a promised HK$200 (US$25.6) incentive upon completion, or (4) a prepaid HK$100 incentive plus another promised HK$100 incentive (“mixed incentive”). Crude risk ratios from log-binomial regression models were used to assess if the 3 incentive schemes predicted higher rates of consent at baseline or retention at 3-month than no incentive.
Results:
In total, 1246 smokers were enrolled. The overall consent and retention rates were 37.1 and 23.0%, respectively. Both rates generally increased with the incentive amount and offer of prepaid incentive. The mixed incentive scheme marginally increased the retention rate versus no incentive (26.8% vs 20.3%; risk ratio (RR) = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00–1.76; P = 0.053), but not the consent rate (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.93–1.38; P = 0.22). Among the consented participants, approximately 50% in the mixed incentive group received the mailed prepaid incentive, who achieved a higher retention rate than the group without incentives (82.8% vs 56.1%; RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.21–1.80; P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
The mixed incentive scheme combining the prepaid and promised incentive was effective to increase the follow-up retention rate by 48%. We recommend this mixed incentive scheme to increase the follow-up retention rate. More efficient methods of delivering the incentive are needed to maximize its effects.
Trial registration:
U.S. Clinical Trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov, retrospectively registered, reference number: NCT03297866). |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/272082 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.632 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, YTD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Weng, X | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, MP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwong, ACS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, VWY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, TH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-20T10:35:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-20T10:35:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2019, v. 19, article no. 138, p. 1-8 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2288 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/272082 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Monetary incentive is often used to increase response rate in smokers’ survey, but such effect of prepaid and promised incentives in a follow-up survey is unknown. We compared the effect of different incentive schemes on the consent and retention rates in a follow-up survey of adult cigarette smokers. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Hong Kong, China. Smokers who completed a non-incentivized baseline telephone smoking survey were invited to a 3-month follow-up, with randomization into (1) the control group (no incentive), (2) a promised HK$100 (US$12.8) incentive upon completion, (3) a promised HK$200 (US$25.6) incentive upon completion, or (4) a prepaid HK$100 incentive plus another promised HK$100 incentive (“mixed incentive”). Crude risk ratios from log-binomial regression models were used to assess if the 3 incentive schemes predicted higher rates of consent at baseline or retention at 3-month than no incentive. Results: In total, 1246 smokers were enrolled. The overall consent and retention rates were 37.1 and 23.0%, respectively. Both rates generally increased with the incentive amount and offer of prepaid incentive. The mixed incentive scheme marginally increased the retention rate versus no incentive (26.8% vs 20.3%; risk ratio (RR) = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00–1.76; P = 0.053), but not the consent rate (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.93–1.38; P = 0.22). Among the consented participants, approximately 50% in the mixed incentive group received the mailed prepaid incentive, who achieved a higher retention rate than the group without incentives (82.8% vs 56.1%; RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.21–1.80; P < 0.01). Conclusion: The mixed incentive scheme combining the prepaid and promised incentive was effective to increase the follow-up retention rate by 48%. We recommend this mixed incentive scheme to increase the follow-up retention rate. More efficient methods of delivering the incentive are needed to maximize its effects. Trial registration: U.S. Clinical Trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov, retrospectively registered, reference number: NCT03297866). | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedresmethodol/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Medical Research Methodology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Incentive | - |
dc.subject | Follow-up | - |
dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | - |
dc.subject | Smoker | - |
dc.title | Effect of Prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, YTD: takderek@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Weng, X: wengxue@connect.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wang, MP: mpwang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, SY: syho@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, TH: hrmrlth@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, YTD=rp02262 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Wang, MP=rp01863 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, SY=rp00427 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, TH=rp00326 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31272393 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC6610937 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85068565892 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 298543 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 138, p. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 138, p. 8 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000474558200002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1471-2288 | - |