File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85062148243
- PMID: 30851906
- WOS: WOS:000460545400041
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Better survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy following transarterial chemoembolization in nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis
Title | Better survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy following transarterial chemoembolization in nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Hepatocellular carcinoma Unresectable Stereotactic body radiation therapy Transarterial chemoembolization Outcomes |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/suronc |
Citation | Surgical Oncology, 2019, v. 28, p. 228-235 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background
This study compared outcomes of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs. stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after TACE (TACE + SBRT).
Methods
This was a retrospective study of 2 centers in Hong Kong. There were 49 patients who had TACE + SBRT and 202 patients who had TACE alone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in patients’ demographics and tumor characteristics between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity.
Results
After matching, 49 patients were in the TACE + SBRT group and 98 patients in the TACE group with similar baseline characteristics. The 1-&3-year OS were better in TACE + SBRT group (67.2 vs. 43.9% and 36.5 vs. 13.3%, p = 0.003). The 1-&3-year PFS was also better in TACE + SBRT group (32.5 vs. 21.4% and 15.1 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.012). Radiological disease control was better in the TACE + SBRT group (98 vs. 56.7%). Risk of severe toxicity was uncommon in both treatment arms. TACE + SBRT was an independent good prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis, whereas AFP>200 ng/ml, large tumor and multiple tumors predicted worse OS.
Conclusion
TACE + SBRT is safe and results in better survivals in nonresectable HCC patients. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/271414 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.651 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wong, TCL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chiang, CL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, AS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, VHF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, CSY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, CHM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, TT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, KKC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chok, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, ACY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dai, WC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, FCS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Luk, MY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, TW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lo, CM | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-24T01:09:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-24T01:09:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Surgical Oncology, 2019, v. 28, p. 228-235 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-7404 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/271414 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background This study compared outcomes of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs. stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after TACE (TACE + SBRT). Methods This was a retrospective study of 2 centers in Hong Kong. There were 49 patients who had TACE + SBRT and 202 patients who had TACE alone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in patients’ demographics and tumor characteristics between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity. Results After matching, 49 patients were in the TACE + SBRT group and 98 patients in the TACE group with similar baseline characteristics. The 1-&3-year OS were better in TACE + SBRT group (67.2 vs. 43.9% and 36.5 vs. 13.3%, p = 0.003). The 1-&3-year PFS was also better in TACE + SBRT group (32.5 vs. 21.4% and 15.1 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.012). Radiological disease control was better in the TACE + SBRT group (98 vs. 56.7%). Risk of severe toxicity was uncommon in both treatment arms. TACE + SBRT was an independent good prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis, whereas AFP>200 ng/ml, large tumor and multiple tumors predicted worse OS. Conclusion TACE + SBRT is safe and results in better survivals in nonresectable HCC patients. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/suronc | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Surgical Oncology | - |
dc.subject | Hepatocellular carcinoma | - |
dc.subject | Unresectable | - |
dc.subject | Stereotactic body radiation therapy | - |
dc.subject | Transarterial chemoembolization | - |
dc.subject | Outcomes | - |
dc.title | Better survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy following transarterial chemoembolization in nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, TCL: wongtcl@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chiang, CL: chiangcl@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lee, VHF: vhflee@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, TT: cheung68@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, KKC: kkcng@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chok, SH: chok6275@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, ACY: acchan@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Dai, WC: daiwc@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Luk, MY: myluk@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, TW: ltw920@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Wong, TCL=rp01679 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chiang, CL=rp02241 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lee, VHF=rp00264 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, TT=rp02129 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, KKC=rp02390 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chok, SH=rp02110 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, ACY=rp00310 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lo, CM=rp00412 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.006 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30851906 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85062148243 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 297967 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 228 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 235 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000460545400041 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0960-7404 | - |