File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book Chapter: Negotiating Evidence and Efficacy in Experimental Medicine

TitleNegotiating Evidence and Efficacy in Experimental Medicine
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherCornell University Press
Citation
Negotiating Evidence and Efficacy in Experimental Medicine. In Greenhalgh, S. and Li, Z (Eds.), Can Science and Technology Save China?. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2020 How to Cite?
AbstractThe transition from laboratory bench to hospital bed is happening at an accelerated pace in contemporary China, with increasing numbers of new treatments being tested on patients. As the former emphasis on state-funded preventive care has yielded to a market-driven pursuit of high-tech interventions and subsequent efforts to redress growing health inequalities, ambitious Chinese clinicians and their increasingly globalized clientele have latched onto biomedical innovation as their ticket to personal success. This chapter examines how how clinicians and patients have interpreted signs of evidence, negotiated standards of proof, and resolved questions of efficacy in the transnational realm of fetal cell therapies. I demonstrate how new modes of validation are emerging as viable alternatives to the hegemonic discourse of randomized controlled trials that has dominated the quest for “evidence” in experimental medicine.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/270057
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSong, PP-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-20T05:08:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-20T05:08:38Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationNegotiating Evidence and Efficacy in Experimental Medicine. In Greenhalgh, S. and Li, Z (Eds.), Can Science and Technology Save China?. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2020-
dc.identifier.isbn9781501747021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/270057-
dc.description.abstractThe transition from laboratory bench to hospital bed is happening at an accelerated pace in contemporary China, with increasing numbers of new treatments being tested on patients. As the former emphasis on state-funded preventive care has yielded to a market-driven pursuit of high-tech interventions and subsequent efforts to redress growing health inequalities, ambitious Chinese clinicians and their increasingly globalized clientele have latched onto biomedical innovation as their ticket to personal success. This chapter examines how how clinicians and patients have interpreted signs of evidence, negotiated standards of proof, and resolved questions of efficacy in the transnational realm of fetal cell therapies. I demonstrate how new modes of validation are emerging as viable alternatives to the hegemonic discourse of randomized controlled trials that has dominated the quest for “evidence” in experimental medicine.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCornell University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofCan Science and Technology Save China?-
dc.titleNegotiating Evidence and Efficacy in Experimental Medicine-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailSong, PP: songp@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authoritySong, PP=rp02412-
dc.identifier.hkuros297849-
dc.publisher.placeIthaca, NY-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats