File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1057/9781137295408_6
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85015822143
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Gender-sensitive indicators for healthcare
Title | Gender-sensitive indicators for healthcare |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan. |
Citation | Gender-sensitive Indicators for Healthcare. In Kuhlmann, E, Annandale, E (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare (2nd Edition), p. 92-110. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © Ellen Kuhlmann and Ellen Annandale 2010, 2012. All rights reserved. The use of gender-sensitive indicators is a critical component in the effort for effective gender mainstreaming. Gender mainstreaming was endorsed to promote equity between women and men at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, and more recently, in 2006, in a resolution of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC, 2006). International organizations regularly collect data from member states and publish voluminous collections of national statistics. The importance of this for gender mainstreaming has recently been underscored by Sen and colleagues in their report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity, which proposed the following strategy: Ensure collection of data disaggregated by sex, socioeconomic status, and other social stratifiers by individual research projects as well as through larger data systems at regional and national levels, and the classification and analysis of such data towards meaningful results and expansion of knowledge for policy. (Sen et al., 2007: x) Concern about the lack of sex-disaggregation of routinely collected statistics has led to attempts to develop indicators for gender equity and health at the global, national and sub-national level (Beck, 1999; UNIFEM, 2000). Comprehensive women’s health surveillance reporting, such as report cards, have also been attempted in some countries, along with concerted global efforts to engender the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (UNIFEM, 2008). The use of gender-sensitive indicators is a critical component in the effort for effective gender mainstreaming. Gender mainstreaming was endorsed to promote equity between women and men at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, and more recently, in 2006, in a resolution of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC, 2006). International organizations regularly collect data from member states and publish voluminous collections of national statistics. The importance of this for gender mainstreaming has recently been underscored by Sen and colleagues in their report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity, which proposed the following strategy: Ensure collection of data disaggregated by sex, socioeconomic status, and other social stratifiers by individual research projects as well as through larger data systems at regional and national levels, and the classification and analysis of such data towards meaningful results and expansion of knowledge for policy. (Sen et al., 2007: x) Concern about the lack of sex-disaggregation of routinely collected statistics has led to attempts to develop indicators for gender equity and health at the global, national and sub-national level (Beck, 1999; UNIFEM, 2000). Comprehensive women’s health surveillance reporting, such as report cards, have also been attempted in some countries, along with concerted global efforts to engender the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (UNIFEM, 2008). |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/269784 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Vivian | - |
dc.contributor.author | L’Orange, Helen | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-06T01:38:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-06T01:38:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gender-sensitive Indicators for Healthcare. In Kuhlmann, E, Annandale, E (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare (2nd Edition), p. 92-110. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781137015143 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/269784 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © Ellen Kuhlmann and Ellen Annandale 2010, 2012. All rights reserved. The use of gender-sensitive indicators is a critical component in the effort for effective gender mainstreaming. Gender mainstreaming was endorsed to promote equity between women and men at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, and more recently, in 2006, in a resolution of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC, 2006). International organizations regularly collect data from member states and publish voluminous collections of national statistics. The importance of this for gender mainstreaming has recently been underscored by Sen and colleagues in their report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity, which proposed the following strategy: Ensure collection of data disaggregated by sex, socioeconomic status, and other social stratifiers by individual research projects as well as through larger data systems at regional and national levels, and the classification and analysis of such data towards meaningful results and expansion of knowledge for policy. (Sen et al., 2007: x) Concern about the lack of sex-disaggregation of routinely collected statistics has led to attempts to develop indicators for gender equity and health at the global, national and sub-national level (Beck, 1999; UNIFEM, 2000). Comprehensive women’s health surveillance reporting, such as report cards, have also been attempted in some countries, along with concerted global efforts to engender the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (UNIFEM, 2008). | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of gender-sensitive indicators is a critical component in the effort for effective gender mainstreaming. Gender mainstreaming was endorsed to promote equity between women and men at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, and more recently, in 2006, in a resolution of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC, 2006). International organizations regularly collect data from member states and publish voluminous collections of national statistics. The importance of this for gender mainstreaming has recently been underscored by Sen and colleagues in their report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity, which proposed the following strategy: Ensure collection of data disaggregated by sex, socioeconomic status, and other social stratifiers by individual research projects as well as through larger data systems at regional and national levels, and the classification and analysis of such data towards meaningful results and expansion of knowledge for policy. (Sen et al., 2007: x) Concern about the lack of sex-disaggregation of routinely collected statistics has led to attempts to develop indicators for gender equity and health at the global, national and sub-national level (Beck, 1999; UNIFEM, 2000). Comprehensive women’s health surveillance reporting, such as report cards, have also been attempted in some countries, along with concerted global efforts to engender the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (UNIFEM, 2008). | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Palgrave Macmillan. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare (2nd Edition) | - |
dc.title | Gender-sensitive indicators for healthcare | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1057/9781137295408_6 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85015822143 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 92 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 110 | - |
dc.publisher.place | London | - |