File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/cobi.13159
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85053341510
- PMID: 29923638
- WOS: WOS:000449856900022
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Ten-year assessment of the 100 priority questions for global biodiversity conservation
Title | Ten-year assessment of the 100 priority questions for global biodiversity conservation |
---|---|
Authors | Jucker, TommasoWintle, BonnieShackelford, GormBocquillon, PierreGeffert, Jan LaurensKasoar, TimKovacs, EszterMumby, Hannah S.Orland, ChloéSchleicher, JudithTew, Eleanor R.Zabala, AioraAmano, TatsuyaBell, AlexandraBongalov, BorisChambers, Josephine M.Corrigan, ColleenDurán, América P.Duvic-Paoli, Leslie AnneEmilson, CarolineEmilson, Erik J.S.da Silva, Jéssica FonsecaGarnett, Emma E.Green, Elizabeth J.Guth, Miriam K.Hacket-Pain, AndrewHinsley, AmyIgea, JavierKunz, MartinaLuke, Sarah H.Lynam, WilliamMartin, Philip A.Nunes, Matheus H.Ockendon, NancyPavitt, AlyPayne, Charlotte L.R.Plutshack, VictoriaRademacher, Tim T.Robertson, Rebecca J.Rose, David C.Serban, AncaSimmons, Benno I.Tayleur, CatherineWordley, Claire F.R.Mukherjee, Nibedita |
Keywords | network analysis 文献综述, 水平扫描,知识空缺, 网络分析, 确定保护优先性, 问卷, 研究议程 vacíos de conocimiento revisión de la literatura research agenda questionnaire priority setting literature review knowledge gaps horizon scanning establecimiento de prioridades escaneo del horizonte cuestionario análisis de redes agenda de investigación |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Conservation Biology, 2018, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1457-1463 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. In 2008, a group of conservation scientists compiled a list of 100 priority questions for the conservation of the world's biodiversity. However, now almost a decade later, no one has yet published a study gauging how much progress has been made in addressing these 100 high-priority questions in the peer-reviewed literature. We took a first step toward reexamining the 100 questions to identify key knowledge gaps that remain. Through a combination of a questionnaire and a literature review, we evaluated each question on the basis of 2 criteria: relevance and effort. We defined highly relevant questions as those that – if answered – would have the greatest impact on global biodiversity conservation and quantified effort based on the number of review publications addressing a particular question, which we used as a proxy for research effort. Using this approach, we identified a set of questions that, despite being perceived as highly relevant, have been the focus of relatively few review publications over the past 10 years. These questions covered a broad range of topics but predominantly tackled 3 major themes: conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems, role of societal structures in shaping interactions between people and the environment, and impacts of conservation interventions. We believe these questions represent important knowledge gaps that have received insufficient attention and may need to be prioritized in future research. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/269664 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.168 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jucker, Tommaso | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wintle, Bonnie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shackelford, Gorm | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bocquillon, Pierre | - |
dc.contributor.author | Geffert, Jan Laurens | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kasoar, Tim | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kovacs, Eszter | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mumby, Hannah S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Orland, Chloé | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schleicher, Judith | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tew, Eleanor R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zabala, Aiora | - |
dc.contributor.author | Amano, Tatsuya | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, Alexandra | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bongalov, Boris | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chambers, Josephine M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Corrigan, Colleen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Durán, América P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Duvic-Paoli, Leslie Anne | - |
dc.contributor.author | Emilson, Caroline | - |
dc.contributor.author | Emilson, Erik J.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | da Silva, Jéssica Fonseca | - |
dc.contributor.author | Garnett, Emma E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Green, Elizabeth J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guth, Miriam K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hacket-Pain, Andrew | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hinsley, Amy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Igea, Javier | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kunz, Martina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Luke, Sarah H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lynam, William | - |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Philip A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nunes, Matheus H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ockendon, Nancy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pavitt, Aly | - |
dc.contributor.author | Payne, Charlotte L.R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Plutshack, Victoria | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rademacher, Tim T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Robertson, Rebecca J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rose, David C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Serban, Anca | - |
dc.contributor.author | Simmons, Benno I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tayleur, Catherine | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wordley, Claire F.R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mukherjee, Nibedita | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-30T01:49:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-30T01:49:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Conservation Biology, 2018, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1457-1463 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0888-8892 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/269664 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. In 2008, a group of conservation scientists compiled a list of 100 priority questions for the conservation of the world's biodiversity. However, now almost a decade later, no one has yet published a study gauging how much progress has been made in addressing these 100 high-priority questions in the peer-reviewed literature. We took a first step toward reexamining the 100 questions to identify key knowledge gaps that remain. Through a combination of a questionnaire and a literature review, we evaluated each question on the basis of 2 criteria: relevance and effort. We defined highly relevant questions as those that – if answered – would have the greatest impact on global biodiversity conservation and quantified effort based on the number of review publications addressing a particular question, which we used as a proxy for research effort. Using this approach, we identified a set of questions that, despite being perceived as highly relevant, have been the focus of relatively few review publications over the past 10 years. These questions covered a broad range of topics but predominantly tackled 3 major themes: conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems, role of societal structures in shaping interactions between people and the environment, and impacts of conservation interventions. We believe these questions represent important knowledge gaps that have received insufficient attention and may need to be prioritized in future research. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Conservation Biology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | network analysis | - |
dc.subject | 文献综述, 水平扫描,知识空缺, 网络分析, 确定保护优先性, 问卷, 研究议程 | - |
dc.subject | vacíos de conocimiento | - |
dc.subject | revisión de la literatura | - |
dc.subject | research agenda | - |
dc.subject | questionnaire | - |
dc.subject | priority setting | - |
dc.subject | literature review | - |
dc.subject | knowledge gaps | - |
dc.subject | horizon scanning | - |
dc.subject | establecimiento de prioridades | - |
dc.subject | escaneo del horizonte | - |
dc.subject | cuestionario | - |
dc.subject | análisis de redes | - |
dc.subject | agenda de investigación | - |
dc.title | Ten-year assessment of the 100 priority questions for global biodiversity conservation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/cobi.13159 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 29923638 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85053341510 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 32 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1457 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1463 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1523-1739 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000449856900022 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0888-8892 | - |