File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book Chapter: Driving With The Rearview Mirror? Historical Analogies And European Foreign Policy

TitleDriving With The Rearview Mirror? Historical Analogies And European Foreign Policy
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherRoutledge
Citation
Driving With The Rearview Mirror? Historical Analogies And European Foreign Policy. In Leutzsch, Andreas (Ed.), Historical Parallels, Commemoration and Icons, p. 100-114. Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2019 How to Cite?
AbstractHistorical analogies are a key feature permeating the conduct of European foreign policy. As I will show in this chapter, analogies are problematic on a number of levels and yet they regularly recur in the practices and narratives of European foreign policy. This is partly because historical analogies serve an important cognitive-organizational function that leaders and officials often resort to in times of crisis, when there is an urgent need to make policy decisions and there is little scope for policy appraisal and deliberation. But historical analogies also serve more overtly political purposes, both as rhetorical constructs mobilized to justify foreign-policy decisions vis-à-vis the public, as well as explanatory frameworks for making sense of broader structural shifts within the international order. The instrumentalization of history – through the use of analogies – provides important insights into the complex and interrelated roles, which history, perceptions, norms and individuals play in the conduct of Europe’s international relations.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/269538
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVogt, CR-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-24T08:09:44Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-24T08:09:44Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationDriving With The Rearview Mirror? Historical Analogies And European Foreign Policy. In Leutzsch, Andreas (Ed.), Historical Parallels, Commemoration and Icons, p. 100-114. Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2019-
dc.identifier.isbn9781138579484-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/269538-
dc.description.abstractHistorical analogies are a key feature permeating the conduct of European foreign policy. As I will show in this chapter, analogies are problematic on a number of levels and yet they regularly recur in the practices and narratives of European foreign policy. This is partly because historical analogies serve an important cognitive-organizational function that leaders and officials often resort to in times of crisis, when there is an urgent need to make policy decisions and there is little scope for policy appraisal and deliberation. But historical analogies also serve more overtly political purposes, both as rhetorical constructs mobilized to justify foreign-policy decisions vis-à-vis the public, as well as explanatory frameworks for making sense of broader structural shifts within the international order. The instrumentalization of history – through the use of analogies – provides important insights into the complex and interrelated roles, which history, perceptions, norms and individuals play in the conduct of Europe’s international relations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.relation.ispartofHistorical Parallels, Commemoration and Icons-
dc.titleDriving With The Rearview Mirror? Historical Analogies And European Foreign Policy-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailVogt, CR: crvogt@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityVogt, CR=rp01448-
dc.identifier.hkuros297598-
dc.identifier.spage100-
dc.identifier.epage114-
dc.publisher.placeAbingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York, NY-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats