File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Why screen for colorectal cancer?

TitleWhy screen for colorectal cancer?
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherMalaysian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (MSGH).
Citation
Gut 2017, Annual Scientific Congress of the Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Penang, Malaysia, 11-13 August 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the second in women in the world. Although there is a wide geographic variation in CRC incidences with higher incidences in more developed regions, the CRC incidences are also rising rapidly in many Asian countries. In Hong Kong, colorectal cancer has already surpassed lung cancer as the most prevalent cancer. Unlike many other cancers, CRC has a very well recognized precursor lesion, namely adenoma, which makes early detection and removal possible. High quality data from previous trials have confirmed that screening of CRC could reduce the incidence and mortality related to CRC. The simple fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has been shown to reduce cancer mortality by 15-30%. As yet, data on the more sensitive and specific fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are lacking but it is anticipated to be superior to FOBT. Flexible sigmoidoscopy has also been shown in randomized controlled studies to reduce CRC mortality by about 47% but this reduction is limited to distal cancer. On other hand, colonoscopy has been found to reduce CRC mortality by about 68%. Notably, the cancer mortality reduction is also higher for distal than proximal CRC. Despite all the benefits of CRC screening, there are also drawbacks such as potential complications related to screening and the cost of screening. The highest complications and cost are expected with the use of screening colonoscopy. However, cost-effectiveness study still showed that among various screening strategies, colonoscopy is associated with the highest life years gained, highest number of CRC prevented and the lowest total costs. There are overwhelming evidences to support that CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. Whilst CRC is rapidly emerging in Asian countries, the adoption of a national CRC screening program is urgently needed.
DescriptionSymposium 3 – Colorectal Cancer Screening
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/269236

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, WK-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-17T03:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-17T03:00:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationGut 2017, Annual Scientific Congress of the Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Penang, Malaysia, 11-13 August 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/269236-
dc.descriptionSymposium 3 – Colorectal Cancer Screening-
dc.description.abstractColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the second in women in the world. Although there is a wide geographic variation in CRC incidences with higher incidences in more developed regions, the CRC incidences are also rising rapidly in many Asian countries. In Hong Kong, colorectal cancer has already surpassed lung cancer as the most prevalent cancer. Unlike many other cancers, CRC has a very well recognized precursor lesion, namely adenoma, which makes early detection and removal possible. High quality data from previous trials have confirmed that screening of CRC could reduce the incidence and mortality related to CRC. The simple fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has been shown to reduce cancer mortality by 15-30%. As yet, data on the more sensitive and specific fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are lacking but it is anticipated to be superior to FOBT. Flexible sigmoidoscopy has also been shown in randomized controlled studies to reduce CRC mortality by about 47% but this reduction is limited to distal cancer. On other hand, colonoscopy has been found to reduce CRC mortality by about 68%. Notably, the cancer mortality reduction is also higher for distal than proximal CRC. Despite all the benefits of CRC screening, there are also drawbacks such as potential complications related to screening and the cost of screening. The highest complications and cost are expected with the use of screening colonoscopy. However, cost-effectiveness study still showed that among various screening strategies, colonoscopy is associated with the highest life years gained, highest number of CRC prevented and the lowest total costs. There are overwhelming evidences to support that CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. Whilst CRC is rapidly emerging in Asian countries, the adoption of a national CRC screening program is urgently needed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMalaysian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (MSGH). -
dc.relation.ispartofGut 2017, Annual Scientific Congress of the Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.titleWhy screen for colorectal cancer?-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, WK: waikleung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, WK=rp01479-
dc.identifier.hkuros286039-
dc.publisher.placeMalaysia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats