File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.066
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-70349202392
- PMID: 19660377
- WOS: WOS:000270017000021
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Device management of arrhythmias after Fontan conversion
Title | Device management of arrhythmias after Fontan conversion |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Citation | Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009, v. 138, n. 4, p. 937-940 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: We assessed our pacemaker strategy, use of antitachycardia therapies, generator longevity, and need for programming changes in patients having Fontan conversion with arrhythmia surgery. Methods: Between 1994 and 2008, of 121 consecutive patients having Fontan conversion and arrhythmia surgeries, 120 patients underwent pacemaker implantation at the time of Fontan conversion (mean age 22.9 ± 8.1 years). Prior pacemakers were in place in 32/120 (26.7%) patients. Between 1994 and 1998, single-chamber atrial antitachycardia pacemakers were implanted (n = 12); atrial rate-responsive pacemakers (n = 31) were implanted between 1998 and 2002. Dual-chamber rate-responsive pacemakers (n = 16) were used between 2002 and 2003, and subsequently dual-chamber antitachycardia pacemakers (n = 61) have become the pacemaker of choice. Leads have evolved from transatrial endocardial leads to epicardial unipolar and subsequently bipolar leads. Results: Among 87 patients with adequate follow-up, all are currently atrially paced at a minimum lower rate ≥70 beats per minute. Single-chamber atrial pacemakers were implanted in 43 (antitachycardia in 12), and dual-chamber pacemakers in 77 (antitachycardia in 61); multisite ventricular leads were placed in 7 patients. Far-field R-wave sensing in 78.6% of unipolar atrial leads led to use of epicardial bipolar leads. Late atrioventricular block (24%) led to routine implantation of dual-chamber pacemakers. Antitachycardia pacing was utilized in 7%. One patient required acute lead revision and 4 required late upgrade to dual-chamber pacemakers. There was no pacemaker-related infection. Twenty patients required generator change, and the mean device longevity was 7.53 years. Conclusions: Customized pacemaker therapy can optimize management of patients following Fontan conversion. Device longevity is excellent. Based on our experience with 120 Fontan conversions, we recommend placement of a dual-chamber antitachycardia pacemaker with bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads in all patients at the time of the conversion. © 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/268922 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.744 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tsao, Sabrina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Deal, Barbara J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Backer, Carl L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ward, Kendra | - |
dc.contributor.author | Franklin, Wayne H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mavroudis, Constantine | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-07T15:08:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-07T15:08:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009, v. 138, n. 4, p. 937-940 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-5223 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/268922 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: We assessed our pacemaker strategy, use of antitachycardia therapies, generator longevity, and need for programming changes in patients having Fontan conversion with arrhythmia surgery. Methods: Between 1994 and 2008, of 121 consecutive patients having Fontan conversion and arrhythmia surgeries, 120 patients underwent pacemaker implantation at the time of Fontan conversion (mean age 22.9 ± 8.1 years). Prior pacemakers were in place in 32/120 (26.7%) patients. Between 1994 and 1998, single-chamber atrial antitachycardia pacemakers were implanted (n = 12); atrial rate-responsive pacemakers (n = 31) were implanted between 1998 and 2002. Dual-chamber rate-responsive pacemakers (n = 16) were used between 2002 and 2003, and subsequently dual-chamber antitachycardia pacemakers (n = 61) have become the pacemaker of choice. Leads have evolved from transatrial endocardial leads to epicardial unipolar and subsequently bipolar leads. Results: Among 87 patients with adequate follow-up, all are currently atrially paced at a minimum lower rate ≥70 beats per minute. Single-chamber atrial pacemakers were implanted in 43 (antitachycardia in 12), and dual-chamber pacemakers in 77 (antitachycardia in 61); multisite ventricular leads were placed in 7 patients. Far-field R-wave sensing in 78.6% of unipolar atrial leads led to use of epicardial bipolar leads. Late atrioventricular block (24%) led to routine implantation of dual-chamber pacemakers. Antitachycardia pacing was utilized in 7%. One patient required acute lead revision and 4 required late upgrade to dual-chamber pacemakers. There was no pacemaker-related infection. Twenty patients required generator change, and the mean device longevity was 7.53 years. Conclusions: Customized pacemaker therapy can optimize management of patients following Fontan conversion. Device longevity is excellent. Based on our experience with 120 Fontan conversions, we recommend placement of a dual-chamber antitachycardia pacemaker with bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads in all patients at the time of the conversion. © 2009 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | - |
dc.title | Device management of arrhythmias after Fontan conversion | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.066 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19660377 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-70349202392 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 138 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 937 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 940 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000270017000021 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0022-5223 | - |