File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Carbon exchange in an Amazon forest: From hours to years

TitleCarbon exchange in an Amazon forest: From hours to years
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
Biogeosciences, 2018, v. 15, n. 15, p. 4833-4848 How to Cite?
Abstract© Author(s) 2018. In Amazon forests, the relative contributions of climate, phenology, and disturbance to net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE) are not well understood. To partition influences across various timescales, we use a statistical model to represent eddy-covariance-derived NEE in an evergreen eastern Amazon forest as a constant response to changing meteorology and phenology throughout a decade. Our best fit model represented hourly NEE variations as changes due to sunlight, while seasonal variations arose from phenology influencing photosynthesis and from rainfall influencing ecosystem respiration, where phenology was asynchronous with dry-season onset. We compared annual model residuals with biometric forest surveys to estimate impacts of drought disturbance. We found that our simple model represented hourly and monthly variations in NEE well (R 2 Combining double low line 0.81 and 0.59, respectively). Modeled phenology explained 1 % of hourly and 26 % of monthly variations in observed NEE, whereas the remaining modeled variability was due to changes in meteorology. We did not find evidence to support the common assumption that the forest phenology was seasonally light- or water-triggered. Our model simulated annual NEE well, with the exception of 2002, the first year of our data record, which contained 1.2 MgC ha'1 of residual net emissions, because photosynthesis was anomalously low. Because a severe drought occurred in 1998, we hypothesized that this drought caused a persistent, multi-year depression of photosynthesis. Our results suggest drought can have lasting impacts on photosynthesis, possibly via partial damage to still-living trees.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267106
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.767
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayek, Matthew N.-
dc.contributor.authorLongo, Marcos-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jin-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Marielle N.-
dc.contributor.authorRestrepo-Coupe, Natalia-
dc.contributor.authorTapajós, Raphael-
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorFitzjarrald, David R.-
dc.contributor.authorCamargo, Plinio B.-
dc.contributor.authorHutyra, Lucy R.-
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Luciana F.-
dc.contributor.authorDaube, Bruce-
dc.contributor.authorWilliam Munger, J.-
dc.contributor.authorWiedemann, Kenia T.-
dc.contributor.authorSaleska, Scott R.-
dc.contributor.authorWofsy, Steven C.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:20:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:20:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationBiogeosciences, 2018, v. 15, n. 15, p. 4833-4848-
dc.identifier.issn1726-4170-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267106-
dc.description.abstract© Author(s) 2018. In Amazon forests, the relative contributions of climate, phenology, and disturbance to net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE) are not well understood. To partition influences across various timescales, we use a statistical model to represent eddy-covariance-derived NEE in an evergreen eastern Amazon forest as a constant response to changing meteorology and phenology throughout a decade. Our best fit model represented hourly NEE variations as changes due to sunlight, while seasonal variations arose from phenology influencing photosynthesis and from rainfall influencing ecosystem respiration, where phenology was asynchronous with dry-season onset. We compared annual model residuals with biometric forest surveys to estimate impacts of drought disturbance. We found that our simple model represented hourly and monthly variations in NEE well (R 2 Combining double low line 0.81 and 0.59, respectively). Modeled phenology explained 1 % of hourly and 26 % of monthly variations in observed NEE, whereas the remaining modeled variability was due to changes in meteorology. We did not find evidence to support the common assumption that the forest phenology was seasonally light- or water-triggered. Our model simulated annual NEE well, with the exception of 2002, the first year of our data record, which contained 1.2 MgC ha'1 of residual net emissions, because photosynthesis was anomalously low. Because a severe drought occurred in 1998, we hypothesized that this drought caused a persistent, multi-year depression of photosynthesis. Our results suggest drought can have lasting impacts on photosynthesis, possibly via partial damage to still-living trees.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBiogeosciences-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleCarbon exchange in an Amazon forest: From hours to years-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/bg-15-4833-2018-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85051718175-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue15-
dc.identifier.spage4833-
dc.identifier.epage4848-
dc.identifier.eissn1726-4189-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000441625600003-
dc.identifier.issnl1726-4170-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats