File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Who helping helps: An event-sampling study of how basic psychological needs moderate the impact of acting prosocially

TitleWho helping helps: An event-sampling study of how basic psychological needs moderate the impact of acting prosocially
Authors
KeywordsProsociality
well-being
self-determination theory
event-sampling
Issue Date2018
Citation
Journal of Positive Psychology, 2018, v. 13, n. 6, p. 563-572 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Growing work suggests that prosociality–actions such as kindness and generosity–boosts the well-being of altruists, yet this effect is not universally true for all individuals. Thus, a major question moving forward is who reaps the largest benefits of acting prosocially. Here, we propose that trait differences in satisfaction of needs (i.e. autonomy, competence, and relatedness) act as key moderators of the effect of prosociality on well-being. We tested two competing hypotheses–deprivation vs. sensitization models–in a 14-day event-sampling study of 383 community participants. We found that people with lower trait autonomy experienced a greater well-being boost after acting prosocially than their higher counterparts. Moreover, this relationship was further mediated by state autonomy. Our findings highlight the special role autonomy, but not competence or relatedness, plays in explaining individual differences in who benefits from acting prosocially–and the mechanism behind this process.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267073
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.878
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, Bryant Pui Hung-
dc.contributor.authorKogan, Aleksandr-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:20:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:20:26Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Positive Psychology, 2018, v. 13, n. 6, p. 563-572-
dc.identifier.issn1743-9760-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267073-
dc.description.abstract© 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Growing work suggests that prosociality–actions such as kindness and generosity–boosts the well-being of altruists, yet this effect is not universally true for all individuals. Thus, a major question moving forward is who reaps the largest benefits of acting prosocially. Here, we propose that trait differences in satisfaction of needs (i.e. autonomy, competence, and relatedness) act as key moderators of the effect of prosociality on well-being. We tested two competing hypotheses–deprivation vs. sensitization models–in a 14-day event-sampling study of 383 community participants. We found that people with lower trait autonomy experienced a greater well-being boost after acting prosocially than their higher counterparts. Moreover, this relationship was further mediated by state autonomy. Our findings highlight the special role autonomy, but not competence or relatedness, plays in explaining individual differences in who benefits from acting prosocially–and the mechanism behind this process.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Positive Psychology-
dc.subjectProsociality-
dc.subjectwell-being-
dc.subjectself-determination theory-
dc.subjectevent-sampling-
dc.titleWho helping helps: An event-sampling study of how basic psychological needs moderate the impact of acting prosocially-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17439760.2017.1365165-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85028572908-
dc.identifier.hkuros307626-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage563-
dc.identifier.epage572-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-9779-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000444094700003-
dc.identifier.issnl1743-9760-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats