File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project

TitleThe accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project
Authors
Keywordsadults
Sedentary behaviour
validity
accelerometer
physical activity recall
Issue Date2017
Citation
Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. 255-261 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Sedentary behaviour (SB) has emerged as a modifiable risk factor, but little is known about measurement errors of SB. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of 24-h Physical Activity Recall (24PAR) relative to SenseWear Armband (SWA) for assessing SB. Each participant (n = 1485) undertook a series of data collection procedures on two randomly selected days: wearing a SWA for full 24-h, and then completing the telephone-administered 24PAR the following day to recall the past 24-h activities. Estimates of total sedentary time (TST) were computed without the inclusion of reported or recorded sleep time. Equivalence testing was used to compare estimates of TST. Analyses from equivalence testing showed no significant equivalence of 24PAR for TST (90% CI: 443.0 and 457.6 min · day–1) relative to SWA (equivalence zone: 580.7 and 709.8 min · day–1). Bland–Altman plots indicated individuals that were extremely or minimally sedentary provided relatively comparable sedentary time between 24PAR and SWA. Overweight/obese and/or older individuals were more likely to under-estimate sedentary time than normal weight and/or younger individuals. Measurement errors of 24PAR varied by the level of sedentary time and demographic indicators. This evidence informs future work to develop measurement error models to correct for errors of self-reports.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267029
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 3.4
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.208
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Youngwon-
dc.contributor.authorWelk, Gregory J.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:20:18Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:20:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Sports Sciences, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. 255-261-
dc.identifier.issn0264-0414-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267029-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Sedentary behaviour (SB) has emerged as a modifiable risk factor, but little is known about measurement errors of SB. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of 24-h Physical Activity Recall (24PAR) relative to SenseWear Armband (SWA) for assessing SB. Each participant (n = 1485) undertook a series of data collection procedures on two randomly selected days: wearing a SWA for full 24-h, and then completing the telephone-administered 24PAR the following day to recall the past 24-h activities. Estimates of total sedentary time (TST) were computed without the inclusion of reported or recorded sleep time. Equivalence testing was used to compare estimates of TST. Analyses from equivalence testing showed no significant equivalence of 24PAR for TST (90% CI: 443.0 and 457.6 min · day–1) relative to SWA (equivalence zone: 580.7 and 709.8 min · day–1). Bland–Altman plots indicated individuals that were extremely or minimally sedentary provided relatively comparable sedentary time between 24PAR and SWA. Overweight/obese and/or older individuals were more likely to under-estimate sedentary time than normal weight and/or younger individuals. Measurement errors of 24PAR varied by the level of sedentary time and demographic indicators. This evidence informs future work to develop measurement error models to correct for errors of self-reports.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Sports Sciences-
dc.subjectadults-
dc.subjectSedentary behaviour-
dc.subjectvalidity-
dc.subjectaccelerometer-
dc.subjectphysical activity recall-
dc.titleThe accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02640414.2016.1161218-
dc.identifier.pmid27019092-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84961626101-
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage255-
dc.identifier.epage261-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-447X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000390848200007-
dc.identifier.issnl0264-0414-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats