File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827e5523
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84876110620
- PMID: 23511336
- WOS: WOS:000316740100018
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: ACR appropriateness criteria® radiation therapy for small-cell lung cancer
Title | ACR appropriateness criteria® radiation therapy for small-cell lung cancer |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | appropriateness criteria small cell lung cancer radiation therapy |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Citation | American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 206-213 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The current standard of care for small cell lung cancer is combined-modality therapy, including the use of chemotherapy, surgery (in selected cases of limited stage of disease), and radiation therapy. This review will focus on the role, dose fractionation, technology and timing of thoracic radiation, and the role and dose regimen of prophylactic cranial irradiation for both limited and extensive stage of diseases. Consensus recommendation from experts is summarized in the tables for 2 typical case scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/266959 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.711 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kong, Feng Ming | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lally, Brian E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, Joe Yujiao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chetty, Indrin J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Decker, Roy H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ginsburg, Mark E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kestin, Larry L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Langer, Corey J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Movsas, Benjamin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Videtic, Gregory M.M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Willers, Henning | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-31T07:20:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-31T07:20:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 206-213 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-3732 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/266959 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The current standard of care for small cell lung cancer is combined-modality therapy, including the use of chemotherapy, surgery (in selected cases of limited stage of disease), and radiation therapy. This review will focus on the role, dose fractionation, technology and timing of thoracic radiation, and the role and dose regimen of prophylactic cranial irradiation for both limited and extensive stage of diseases. Consensus recommendation from experts is summarized in the tables for 2 typical case scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials | - |
dc.subject | appropriateness criteria | - |
dc.subject | small cell lung cancer | - |
dc.subject | radiation therapy | - |
dc.title | ACR appropriateness criteria® radiation therapy for small-cell lung cancer | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827e5523 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23511336 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84876110620 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 206 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 213 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1537-453X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000316740100018 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0277-3732 | - |