File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Everything you wanted to know about selecting the " right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but...: A systematic review

TitleEverything you wanted to know about selecting the " right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but...: A systematic review
Authors
KeywordsModerate-to-vigorous physical activity
Calibration
Adolescent
Validation studies
Epoch
Child
Issue Date2012
Citation
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012, v. 15, n. 4, p. 311-321 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the evidence on the calibration of ActiGraph accelerometers to quantify moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for youth through the use of cut-points and describe the independent validation studies comparing the accuracy of the developed cut-points to a criterion measure. Design: A systematic review. Methods: Studies were identified that: (a) developed ActiGraph accelerometer cut-points for children and youth (calibration study); or (b) performed an independent validation of already established cut-points (validation study). Both calibration studies and independent validation studies were retrieved through a systematic search of online databases. According to proposed guidelines for designing accelerometer calibration studies, each calibration study was evaluated on the following criteria: quality of a criterion measure employed; epoch length; inclusion of a variety of activities; and sample size. Results: A total of 11 calibration studies were identified. Two studies met all four criteria for a calibration study. A total of 4 independent validation studies were identified. Three of them reported that no cut-points accurately classified moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) across all ranges of physical activity intensity levels in comparison to a criterion measure. The fourth study reported two sets of cut-points that under laboratory conditions, accurately classified moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared to indirect calorimetry. Conclusions: Limited evidence suggests that two sets of cut-points correctly classify ActiGraph counts into moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). However, limitations with calibration and validation studies indicate greater efforts aimed at designing high quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. © 2011 Sports Medicine Australia.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266934
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.222
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Youngwon-
dc.contributor.authorBeets, Michael W.-
dc.contributor.authorWelk, Gregory J.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:20:01Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012, v. 15, n. 4, p. 311-321-
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266934-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the evidence on the calibration of ActiGraph accelerometers to quantify moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for youth through the use of cut-points and describe the independent validation studies comparing the accuracy of the developed cut-points to a criterion measure. Design: A systematic review. Methods: Studies were identified that: (a) developed ActiGraph accelerometer cut-points for children and youth (calibration study); or (b) performed an independent validation of already established cut-points (validation study). Both calibration studies and independent validation studies were retrieved through a systematic search of online databases. According to proposed guidelines for designing accelerometer calibration studies, each calibration study was evaluated on the following criteria: quality of a criterion measure employed; epoch length; inclusion of a variety of activities; and sample size. Results: A total of 11 calibration studies were identified. Two studies met all four criteria for a calibration study. A total of 4 independent validation studies were identified. Three of them reported that no cut-points accurately classified moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) across all ranges of physical activity intensity levels in comparison to a criterion measure. The fourth study reported two sets of cut-points that under laboratory conditions, accurately classified moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared to indirect calorimetry. Conclusions: Limited evidence suggests that two sets of cut-points correctly classify ActiGraph counts into moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). However, limitations with calibration and validation studies indicate greater efforts aimed at designing high quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. © 2011 Sports Medicine Australia.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport-
dc.subjectModerate-to-vigorous physical activity-
dc.subjectCalibration-
dc.subjectAdolescent-
dc.subjectValidation studies-
dc.subjectEpoch-
dc.subjectChild-
dc.titleEverything you wanted to know about selecting the " right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but...: A systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2011.12.001-
dc.identifier.pmid22306372-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84862831891-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage311-
dc.identifier.epage321-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-1861-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000305874200006-
dc.identifier.issnl1878-1861-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats