File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Designing Targets for Elective Nodal Irradiation in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Planning Study

TitleDesigning Targets for Elective Nodal Irradiation in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Planning Study
Authors
KeywordsTarget volume delineation
Planning study
Lung cancer
Elective nodal irradiation
Issue Date2009
Citation
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2009, v. 73, n. 5, p. 1397-1403 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: To assess doses received by mediastinal and hilar lymph node stations (LNS) delineated according to published recommendations when "standard" two-dimensional (2D) elective fields are applied and to assess doses to critical structures when fields are designed using 2D and three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning for elective irradiation. Methods and Materials: LNS were delineated on axial CT scans according to existing recommendations. For each case and tumor location, 2D anteroposterior-posteroanterior (AP-PA) elective fields were applied using the AP-PA CT topograms. From the 2D portal fields, 3D dose distributions were then calculated to particular LNS. Next, 3D plans were prepared for elective nodal irradiation for tumors of different lobes. Doses for critical structures were compared for 2D and 3D plans. Results: LNS 1/2R, 1/2L, 3A, 3P, 5, 6, and 8 were not adequately covered in a substantial part of plans by standard 2D portals when guidelines for delineation were strictly followed. The magnitude of the lack of coverage increased with margin application. There was a trend for a higher yet probably still safe dose delivered to lung for 3D plans compared with 2D plans with a prescription dose of 45 Gy. Conclusions: 2D fields did not entirely cover LNS delineated according to the recommendations for 3D techniques. A strict adherence to these guidelines may lead to larger portals than traditionally constructed using 2D methods. Some modifications for clinical implementation are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266893
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 8.013
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.117
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKepka, Lucyna-
dc.contributor.authorTatro, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Jean M.-
dc.contributor.authorQuint, Leslie E.-
dc.contributor.authorHayman, James A.-
dc.contributor.authorTen Haken, Randall K.-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Feng Ming-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:19:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:19:54Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2009, v. 73, n. 5, p. 1397-1403-
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266893-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess doses received by mediastinal and hilar lymph node stations (LNS) delineated according to published recommendations when "standard" two-dimensional (2D) elective fields are applied and to assess doses to critical structures when fields are designed using 2D and three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning for elective irradiation. Methods and Materials: LNS were delineated on axial CT scans according to existing recommendations. For each case and tumor location, 2D anteroposterior-posteroanterior (AP-PA) elective fields were applied using the AP-PA CT topograms. From the 2D portal fields, 3D dose distributions were then calculated to particular LNS. Next, 3D plans were prepared for elective nodal irradiation for tumors of different lobes. Doses for critical structures were compared for 2D and 3D plans. Results: LNS 1/2R, 1/2L, 3A, 3P, 5, 6, and 8 were not adequately covered in a substantial part of plans by standard 2D portals when guidelines for delineation were strictly followed. The magnitude of the lack of coverage increased with margin application. There was a trend for a higher yet probably still safe dose delivered to lung for 3D plans compared with 2D plans with a prescription dose of 45 Gy. Conclusions: 2D fields did not entirely cover LNS delineated according to the recommendations for 3D techniques. A strict adherence to these guidelines may lead to larger portals than traditionally constructed using 2D methods. Some modifications for clinical implementation are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics-
dc.subjectTarget volume delineation-
dc.subjectPlanning study-
dc.subjectLung cancer-
dc.subjectElective nodal irradiation-
dc.titleDesigning Targets for Elective Nodal Irradiation in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: A Planning Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.036-
dc.identifier.pmid19046824-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-62649099160-
dc.identifier.volume73-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage1397-
dc.identifier.epage1403-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000264728000016-
dc.identifier.issnl0360-3016-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats